Abstract 4365018: Novel Use of KardiaMobile Device to Assess For Vector Suitability for Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Implantation

Background: The subcutaneous implantable defibrillator (S-ICD) was developed to avoid lead related complications and systemic infections. Screening prior to implantation is critical for appropriate sensing of ventricular arrhythmias and to avoid inappropriate shocks. Current screening protocols require in-person assessment using the Zoom Programmer (Boston Scientific), which may not be readily available in many clinical settings and limits accessibility. . We evaluated if the KardiaMobile 6L (KM), a smartphone linked portable ECG, can be used for S-ICD screening. Objectives: To evaluate the clinical utility of the KM device to screen patients indicated for S-ICD. Methods: Patients who met criteria or had already been implanted with an S-ICD or single chamber transvenous ICD were recruited and consented. Paired ECG tracings from the KM and the programmer were collected in primary, secondary, and alternate vectors in both sitting and supine position (Figure 1). ECG tracings from the KM were manually annotated and compared to the programmer. Results: A total of 56 patients (male 76.8%, 56.6±16.2 years) were recruited for the study, which included 336 paired tracings from the programmer and KM (Table 1). A total of 59 (17.5%) of tracings when compared were discordant. When compared to the programmer, KM had a sensitivity of 80% of specificity of 93.9%, with a positive predictive value of 98.2% (Table 2). Alternate standing had the least discordance (n=5), while primary sitting had the highest discordance (n=14). Conclusion: The KardiaMobile 6L provides similar results for screening for S-ICD when compared to the automated programmer. Automated screening and scaling with KM may improve results, and allow for easy and accessible screening for patients and providers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4365018
Primary Topic
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4365018: Novel Use of KardiaMobile Device to Assess For Vector Suitability for Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Implantation

Rand Ibrahim, Mikhael F. El‐Chami, Faisal M. Merchant, Shahriar Iravanian et al.
Circulation
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
article

Abstract 4365018: Novel Use of KardiaMobile Device to Assess For Vector Suitability for Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Implantation

Rand Ibrahim, Mikhael F. El‐Chami, Faisal M. Merchant, Shahriar Iravanian, Gari D. Clifford, Stacy Westerman, Ali Bahrami Rad, Neal Kumar Bhatia, Michael Shane Lloyd, Michael E. DeBakey
article en

Abstract

Background: The subcutaneous implantable defibrillator (S-ICD) was developed to avoid lead related complications and systemic infections. Screening prior to implantation is critical for appropriate sensing of ventricular arrhythmias and to avoid inappropriate shocks. Current screening protocols require in-person assessment using the Zoom Programmer (Boston Scientific), which may not be readily available in many clinical settings and limits accessibility. . We evaluated if the KardiaMobile 6L (KM), a smartphone linked portable ECG, can be used for S-ICD screening. Objectives: To evaluate the clinical utility of the KM device to screen patients indicated for S-ICD. Methods: Patients who met criteria or had already been implanted with an S-ICD or single chamber transvenous ICD were recruited and consented. Paired ECG tracings from the KM and the programmer were collected in primary, secondary, and alternate vectors in both sitting and supine position (Figure 1). ECG tracings from the KM were manually annotated and compared to the programmer. Results: A total of 56 patients (male 76.8%, 56.6±16.2 years) were recruited for the study, which included 336 paired tracings from the programmer and KM (Table 1). A total of 59 (17.5%) of tracings when compared were discordant. When compared to the programmer, KM had a sensitivity of 80% of specificity of 93.9%, with a positive predictive value of 98.2% (Table 2). Alternate standing had the least discordance (n=5), while primary sitting had the highest discordance (n=14). Conclusion: The KardiaMobile 6L provides similar results for screening for S-ICD when compared to the automated programmer. Automated screening and scaling with KM may improve results, and allow for easy and accessible screening for patients and providers.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Emory University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.