Abstract 4366350: Ten-Year Survival in AL Cardiac Amyloidosis: Does Mayo Staging still matter in the Recent era?

Introduction: AL cardiac amyloidosis (AL-CA) is associated with poor prognosis, largely driven by cardiac involvement. The revised Mayo staging system utilizes cardiac biomarkers to risk-stratify and predict outcomes for these patients. However, its long-term predictive value remains uncertain, particularly in the era of novel therapies. This study evaluated the prognostic impact of the revised Mayo staging system, especially on five- and ten-year survival outcomes in AL-CA patients. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients diagnosed with AL-CA at our quaternary center between January 2012 and December 2022. Non-AL amyloidosis patients and those lacking complete data were excluded. Overall survival (OS) was defined from the date of diagnosis until death. Cox regression evaluated associations between Mayo staging and survival. Results: Of 411 patients included, 63.7% were male, 78.6% white, with a median age at AL-CA diagnosis of 68 years (IQR: 31–92). Mayo staging distribution was: stage I (3.6%), stage II (12%), stage III (27.7%), and stage IV (55.5%). During a median follow-up of 25.7 months (IQR: 4.7,56.2), 60.8% (n=250) of patients died. Survival differed significantly by Mayo stage, with a median OS of 80.2 months in stage II, 47.2 months in stage III, and 12.8 months in stage IV (log-rank p < 0.0001) (Figure 1). On multivariable Cox regression, increasing age was independently associated with worse survival (HR = 1.02, 95% CI: 1.01–1.04, p<0.001). Compared to Mayo stage I/II, stage III (HR = 2.02, p=0.005) and stage IV (HR = 2.98, p<0.001) were associated with significantly higher mortality. NYHA class IV was also independently associated with increased risk of death (HR = 1.77, p=0.035) (Figure 2) (Table 1) Long-term follow-up indicated that the 5-year OS was 53.6% (stage I), 73.3% (stage II), 45.5% (stage III), and 32.8% (stage IV). Ten-year OS was 53.6% (stage I), 47.1% (stage II), 23.9% (stage III), and 22.1% (stage IV). Notably, 67% of stage IV survivors at five years remained alive at ten years, comparable to stage II (64%). Conclusion: The revised Mayo staging remains prognostic for AL-CA, demonstrating significant stage-based survival differences. Despite improved outcomes with contemporary treatments, advanced-stage disease remains associated with poorer survival. Importantly, patients in higher-risk stages who reach the five-year mark maintain a substantial likelihood of long-term survival similar to those with less severe stages

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4366350
Primary Topic
Amyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4366350: Ten-Year Survival in AL Cardiac Amyloidosis: Does Mayo Staging still matter in the Recent era?

Faiz Anwer, J. Emanuel Finet, Andres Carmona Rubio, Mazen Hanna et al.
Circulation
Amyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes
article

Abstract 4366350: Ten-Year Survival in AL Cardiac Amyloidosis: Does Mayo Staging still matter in the Recent era?

Faiz Anwer, J. Emanuel Finet, Andres Carmona Rubio, Mazen Hanna, Yan Zou, Ahmed Allam Mohamed, Trejeeve Martyn, Jason Valent, Ahmed M. Mansour, Diana Basali, Xiaofeng Wang
article en

Abstract

Introduction: AL cardiac amyloidosis (AL-CA) is associated with poor prognosis, largely driven by cardiac involvement. The revised Mayo staging system utilizes cardiac biomarkers to risk-stratify and predict outcomes for these patients. However, its long-term predictive value remains uncertain, particularly in the era of novel therapies. This study evaluated the prognostic impact of the revised Mayo staging system, especially on five- and ten-year survival outcomes in AL-CA patients. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients diagnosed with AL-CA at our quaternary center between January 2012 and December 2022. Non-AL amyloidosis patients and those lacking complete data were excluded. Overall survival (OS) was defined from the date of diagnosis until death. Cox regression evaluated associations between Mayo staging and survival. Results: Of 411 patients included, 63.7% were male, 78.6% white, with a median age at AL-CA diagnosis of 68 years (IQR: 31–92). Mayo staging distribution was: stage I (3.6%), stage II (12%), stage III (27.7%), and stage IV (55.5%). During a median follow-up of 25.7 months (IQR: 4.7,56.2), 60.8% (n=250) of patients died. Survival differed significantly by Mayo stage, with a median OS of 80.2 months in stage II, 47.2 months in stage III, and 12.8 months in stage IV (log-rank p < 0.0001) (Figure 1). On multivariable Cox regression, increasing age was independently associated with worse survival (HR = 1.02, 95% CI: 1.01–1.04, p<0.001). Compared to Mayo stage I/II, stage III (HR = 2.02, p=0.005) and stage IV (HR = 2.98, p<0.001) were associated with significantly higher mortality. NYHA class IV was also independently associated with increased risk of death (HR = 1.77, p=0.035) (Figure 2) (Table 1) Long-term follow-up indicated that the 5-year OS was 53.6% (stage I), 73.3% (stage II), 45.5% (stage III), and 32.8% (stage IV). Ten-year OS was 53.6% (stage I), 47.1% (stage II), 23.9% (stage III), and 22.1% (stage IV). Notably, 67% of stage IV survivors at five years remained alive at ten years, comparable to stage II (64%). Conclusion: The revised Mayo staging remains prognostic for AL-CA, demonstrating significant stage-based survival differences. Despite improved outcomes with contemporary treatments, advanced-stage disease remains associated with poorer survival. Importantly, patients in higher-risk stages who reach the five-year mark maintain a substantial likelihood of long-term survival similar to those with less severe stages

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Cleveland Clinic (US), Charleston Area Medical Center (US), Al-Azhar University (EG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Amyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.