Abstract 4370425: Soluble Urokinase Plasminogen Activator Receptor (suPAR), Lipoprotein(a), and Cardiovascular Outcomes in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA)

Background: Chronic inflammation and elevated lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] are key contributors to residual cardiovascular risk. Soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR), a stable immune-derived glycoprotein, has been causally linked to atherosclerosis. While both suPAR and Lp(a) are individually associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD) outcomes, their relationship and comparative prognostic value remain unclear. Methods: We included 4,357 participants without known CVD from the from the Multi-Ethnic study of atherosclerosis (MESA), who had both suPAR and Lp(a) measurements. Spearman’s rank correlation tested associations between the two biomarkers. Cox proportional hazards models evaluated the associations with the composite outcome of all-cause death, CVD death, myocardial infarction, or stroke. Models were adjusted for age, sex, race, BMI, smoking, eGFR, hypertension, diabetes, LDL-C, HDL-C, and mutually for Lp(a) or suPAR. We assessed the predictive ability of biomarkers using discrimination analysis. Results: Median age was 62 years (SD 10.4), 48% were male, and 37.3% were white. Median suPAR was 2.57 ng/mL (IQR 2.0–3.1), and Lp(a) was 17.5 mg/dL (IQR 8.0–39.2). suPAR and Lp(a) were not correlated (Spearman’s rho = 0.008; p = 0.60). In fully adjusted models, elevated suPAR (>3 ng/mL) was associated with a 75% higher risk of the composite outcome (aHR 1.75; 95% CI 1.44–2.26). High Lp(a) (>70 mg/dL) was also associated with increased risk, though of lower magnitude compared to suPAR (aHR 1.50; 95% CI 1.06–2.13). suPAR showed superior risk discrimination performance compared to Lp(a), and adding Lp(a) to suPAR did not improve model performance (Table1). Conclusion: suPAR and Lp(a) are independent biomarkers that do not correlate and reflect distinct inflammatory and lipoprotein-mediated pathways contributing to residual cardiovascular risk. In this low-risk community-based cohort, suPAR is a strong independent biomarker of residual risk and the addition of Lp(a) did not improve risk prediction beyond suPAR.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4370425
Primary Topic
Atherosclerosis and Cardiovascular Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4370425: Soluble Urokinase Plasminogen Activator Receptor (suPAR), Lipoprotein(a), and Cardiovascular Outcomes in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA)

Bahjat Ghazzal, Susan Heckbert, Pennelope Blakely, Christina Hutten et al.
Circulation
Atherosclerosis and Cardiovascular Diseases
article

Abstract 4370425: Soluble Urokinase Plasminogen Activator Receptor (suPAR), Lipoprotein(a), and Cardiovascular Outcomes in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA)

Bahjat Ghazzal, Susan Heckbert, Pennelope Blakely, Christina Hutten, Salim S. Hayek, Anis Ismail, Michael Tsai
article en

Abstract

Background: Chronic inflammation and elevated lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] are key contributors to residual cardiovascular risk. Soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR), a stable immune-derived glycoprotein, has been causally linked to atherosclerosis. While both suPAR and Lp(a) are individually associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD) outcomes, their relationship and comparative prognostic value remain unclear. Methods: We included 4,357 participants without known CVD from the from the Multi-Ethnic study of atherosclerosis (MESA), who had both suPAR and Lp(a) measurements. Spearman’s rank correlation tested associations between the two biomarkers. Cox proportional hazards models evaluated the associations with the composite outcome of all-cause death, CVD death, myocardial infarction, or stroke. Models were adjusted for age, sex, race, BMI, smoking, eGFR, hypertension, diabetes, LDL-C, HDL-C, and mutually for Lp(a) or suPAR. We assessed the predictive ability of biomarkers using discrimination analysis. Results: Median age was 62 years (SD 10.4), 48% were male, and 37.3% were white. Median suPAR was 2.57 ng/mL (IQR 2.0–3.1), and Lp(a) was 17.5 mg/dL (IQR 8.0–39.2). suPAR and Lp(a) were not correlated (Spearman’s rho = 0.008; p = 0.60). In fully adjusted models, elevated suPAR (>3 ng/mL) was associated with a 75% higher risk of the composite outcome (aHR 1.75; 95% CI 1.44–2.26). High Lp(a) (>70 mg/dL) was also associated with increased risk, though of lower magnitude compared to suPAR (aHR 1.50; 95% CI 1.06–2.13). suPAR showed superior risk discrimination performance compared to Lp(a), and adding Lp(a) to suPAR did not improve model performance (Table1). Conclusion: suPAR and Lp(a) are independent biomarkers that do not correlate and reflect distinct inflammatory and lipoprotein-mediated pathways contributing to residual cardiovascular risk. In this low-risk community-based cohort, suPAR is a strong independent biomarker of residual risk and the addition of Lp(a) did not improve risk prediction beyond suPAR.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (US), University of Washington (US), University of Minnesota System (US), University of Illinois Chicago (US), The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Atherosclerosis and Cardiovascular Diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.