Abstract 4371740: Characterizing Shared Genetic Architectures in Brain and Cardiovascular Diseases via Clustering of Survival GWAS Summary Statistics

Background: Clustering neurological, psychiatric, and cardiovascular diseases based on GWAS summary statistics offers opportunities to uncover their shared genetic architecture across the brain–heart axis. Survival GWAS improves biological and clinical resolution over traditional binary trait GWAS by modeling disease age-of-onset as time-to-event (TTE) traits. Research Question: unsupervised clustering of survival GWAS summary statistics uncover biologically coherent disease groups? If so, can we identify cluster-specific hallmark genes that reflect shared genetic architecture and inform downstream analyses such as pathway discovery and therapeutic repurposing? Methods: We selected 64 brain and cardiovascular diseases using distinct one-decimal sub-phecodes. For each TTE trait approximated by age at diagnosis, we extracted Z-scores for 1.28 million HapMap3 SNPs using Genetic Analysis of Time-to-Event phenotypes (GATE), which applied a frailty-adjusted Cox to 408,582 White British participants in the UK Biobank. Trait clustering was performed using HDBSCAN (a hierarchical density-based clustering method) on the first 15 principal components of the Z-scores to emphasize low-rank genetic structure while reducing noise. Within each resulting cluster, we conducted fixed-effect meta-analysis across traits to generate cluster-level GWAS summary statistics, which were then analyzed using MAGMA to assess gene-level associations. Results: We identified 16 disease clusters and reported top three significant genes (FDR < 0.05) for each cluster, visualized using a t-SNE plot (Figure). Several clusters yielded biologically coherent disease grouping and gene signals. For example, the coronary artery disease cluster highlighted CDH13, CSMD1, and PHACTR1; the dementia cluster revealed TOMM40, APOE, and PVRL2; and the conduction disorder cluster identified ADK, VCL and TMEM132D. These genes participate in vascular, neurodegenerative, and electrophysiological processes aligned with their respective disease clusters. In contrast, clusters composed of symptom-based or heterogeneous traits (e.g., palpitations and hypertension) showed no significant gene hits. Conclusions: Clustering TTE traits based on disease age-of-onset-aware GWAS summary statistics can reveal convergent biology across the brain–heart axis. The identification of well-established loci supports this approach as a framework for pathway discovery and therapeutic repurposing in genetically overlapping conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4371740
Primary Topic
Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4371740: Characterizing Shared Genetic Architectures in Brain and Cardiovascular Diseases via Clustering of Survival GWAS Summary Statistics

Xihong Lin, Zhiyu Yan, Rahul Mahajan, Christopher E. Anderson et al.
Circulation
Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
article

Abstract 4371740: Characterizing Shared Genetic Architectures in Brain and Cardiovascular Diseases via Clustering of Survival GWAS Summary Statistics

Xihong Lin, Zhiyu Yan, Rahul Mahajan, Christopher E. Anderson, Rui Duan, Yujia Zhang, Luca Pinello
article en

Abstract

Background: Clustering neurological, psychiatric, and cardiovascular diseases based on GWAS summary statistics offers opportunities to uncover their shared genetic architecture across the brain–heart axis. Survival GWAS improves biological and clinical resolution over traditional binary trait GWAS by modeling disease age-of-onset as time-to-event (TTE) traits. Research Question: unsupervised clustering of survival GWAS summary statistics uncover biologically coherent disease groups? If so, can we identify cluster-specific hallmark genes that reflect shared genetic architecture and inform downstream analyses such as pathway discovery and therapeutic repurposing? Methods: We selected 64 brain and cardiovascular diseases using distinct one-decimal sub-phecodes. For each TTE trait approximated by age at diagnosis, we extracted Z-scores for 1.28 million HapMap3 SNPs using Genetic Analysis of Time-to-Event phenotypes (GATE), which applied a frailty-adjusted Cox to 408,582 White British participants in the UK Biobank. Trait clustering was performed using HDBSCAN (a hierarchical density-based clustering method) on the first 15 principal components of the Z-scores to emphasize low-rank genetic structure while reducing noise. Within each resulting cluster, we conducted fixed-effect meta-analysis across traits to generate cluster-level GWAS summary statistics, which were then analyzed using MAGMA to assess gene-level associations. Results: We identified 16 disease clusters and reported top three significant genes (FDR < 0.05) for each cluster, visualized using a t-SNE plot (Figure). Several clusters yielded biologically coherent disease grouping and gene signals. For example, the coronary artery disease cluster highlighted CDH13, CSMD1, and PHACTR1; the dementia cluster revealed TOMM40, APOE, and PVRL2; and the conduction disorder cluster identified ADK, VCL and TMEM132D. These genes participate in vascular, neurodegenerative, and electrophysiological processes aligned with their respective disease clusters. In contrast, clusters composed of symptom-based or heterogeneous traits (e.g., palpitations and hypertension) showed no significant gene hits. Conclusions: Clustering TTE traits based on disease age-of-onset-aware GWAS summary statistics can reveal convergent biology across the brain–heart axis. The identification of well-established loci supports this approach as a framework for pathway discovery and therapeutic repurposing in genetically overlapping conditions.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Harvard University (US), Massachusetts General Hospital (US), Mass General Brigham (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.