Endogenous competition mode with a common supplier

Abstract We analyze the endogenous choice of competition mode by introducing a common supplier into a vertical structure. Contrary to previous findings, we derive that when choosing a competition mode, firms consider two opposing factors: (i) the horizontal effect arising from competition with a rival firm, and (ii) the vertical effect, which influences the price charged by the common supplier. When the common supplier adopts uniform pricing, if the both products are somewhat differentiated, the vertical effect becomes more important than the horizontal effect, making the price contract the dominant strategy. On the other hand, if the products are sufficiently homogeneous and the horizontal effect is more important than the vertical effect, both firms will choose a quantity contract. Meanwhile, when the common supplier adopts discriminatory pricing, choosing a quantity contract becomes the unique equilibrium. Finally, if the both products are somewhat differentiated, each firm's profit is higher under price competition than under quantity competition.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Economic Theory
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ijet.70010
Primary Topic
Merger and Competition Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Endogenous competition mode with a common supplier

DongJoon Lee, Yuji Ono, Kangsik Choi
International Journal of Economic Theory
Merger and Competition Analysis
article

Endogenous competition mode with a common supplier

DongJoon Lee, Yuji Ono, Kangsik Choi
article en

Abstract

Abstract We analyze the endogenous choice of competition mode by introducing a common supplier into a vertical structure. Contrary to previous findings, we derive that when choosing a competition mode, firms consider two opposing factors: (i) the horizontal effect arising from competition with a rival firm, and (ii) the vertical effect, which influences the price charged by the common supplier. When the common supplier adopts uniform pricing, if the both products are somewhat differentiated, the vertical effect becomes more important than the horizontal effect, making the price contract the dominant strategy. On the other hand, if the products are sufficiently homogeneous and the horizontal effect is more important than the vertical effect, both firms will choose a quantity contract. Meanwhile, when the common supplier adopts discriminatory pricing, choosing a quantity contract becomes the unique equilibrium. Finally, if the both products are somewhat differentiated, each firm's profit is higher under price competition than under quantity competition.

International Journal of Economic TheoryVol. 22(1)
Nagoya University of Commerce and Business (JP), Osaka Sangyo University (JP), Pusan National University (KR), Nagoya University (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Merger and Competition Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.