Imperialism in Marx, the Marxist Tradition, and Today

At the close of the first quarter of the twenty-first century, capitalism’s productive weakness and the challenge of socialist China are sending the imperial countries in a paroxysm of aggression, economic and military. Dominant approaches like “globalization” and “empire,” which also claimed many Marxist theorists, are manifestly discredited. Thanks to a more than century-long surrender to neoclassical economics, Marxists are divided between those who deny the theoretical link between capitalism and imperialism and those who have forsaken Marx and Engels’s work as a guide to theorizing that link and proceed eclectically. Building on the author’s previous work, this article, a revision and extension of her 2025 David Gordon Memorial Lecture, returns to Marx and Engels’s original theorization of capitalism as contradictory value production as the basis for explaining its link to imperialism and resistance to it. It lays bare the geopolitical economy of what Marx called “the relations of producing nations” to explain the current conjuncture of multipolarity and the historical possibilities contained in it. JEL Classification : B14, B24, B51, F54

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Review of Radical Political Economics
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/04866134251366705
Primary Topic
Political Economy and Marxism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Imperialism in Marx, the Marxist Tradition, and Today

Radhika Desai
Review of Radical Political Economics
Political Economy and Marxism
article

Imperialism in Marx, the Marxist Tradition, and Today

Radhika Desai
article en

Abstract

At the close of the first quarter of the twenty-first century, capitalism’s productive weakness and the challenge of socialist China are sending the imperial countries in a paroxysm of aggression, economic and military. Dominant approaches like “globalization” and “empire,” which also claimed many Marxist theorists, are manifestly discredited. Thanks to a more than century-long surrender to neoclassical economics, Marxists are divided between those who deny the theoretical link between capitalism and imperialism and those who have forsaken Marx and Engels’s work as a guide to theorizing that link and proceed eclectically. Building on the author’s previous work, this article, a revision and extension of her 2025 David Gordon Memorial Lecture, returns to Marx and Engels’s original theorization of capitalism as contradictory value production as the basis for explaining its link to imperialism and resistance to it. It lays bare the geopolitical economy of what Marx called “the relations of producing nations” to explain the current conjuncture of multipolarity and the historical possibilities contained in it. JEL Classification : B14, B24, B51, F54

Review of Radical Political EconomicsVol. 57(4)
University of Manitoba (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Political Economy and Marxism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.