Increased autoantibodies against incretin indicate poor prognosis in patients with diabetes

This retrospective cohort study aimed to elucidate the clinical significance of measuring autoantibodies against incretins in diabetes. We enrolled 274 patients with diabetes (mean age ± standard deviation [SD]: 63.1 ± 12.1 years) and 109 healthy controls (mean age: 58.0 ± 5.8 years). Titers of autoantibodies against incretins (glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide and glucagon-like peptide-1) were measured using an amplified luminescent proximity homogeneous assay-linked immunosorbent assay. Both incretin antibody titers were significantly higher in patients with diabetes than in healthy controls (both P < 0.01). A mean 4.9-year (maximum 10-year) follow-up study revealed that patients who tested positive for glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide antibodies had significantly worse prognoses than those who tested negative (P = 0.0072). Patients who tested positive for glucagon-like peptide-1 antibodies also tended to have worse prognoses (P = 0.06). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate autoantibodies against incretin hormones in patients with diabetes. These autoantibodies may serve as novel prognostic biomarkers and provide a rationale for further studies on incretin-based therapies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-22337-z
Primary Topic
Diabetes Treatment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Increased autoantibodies against incretin indicate poor prognosis in patients with diabetes

Masaya Yamaga, Hirotaka Takizawa, Aiko Hayashi, Shunichiro Onishi et al.
Scientific Reports
Diabetes Treatment and Management
article

Increased autoantibodies against incretin indicate poor prognosis in patients with diabetes

Masaya Yamaga, Hirotaka Takizawa, Aiko Hayashi, Shunichiro Onishi, Bo‐Shi Zhang, Takaki Hiwasa, Masaya Koshizaka, Minoru Takemoto, Yoich Yoshida, Tomohiko Yoshida, Takahiro Ishikawa, Hiroki Yamagata, Takahide Hashimoto, Naoki Ohtake
article en

Abstract

This retrospective cohort study aimed to elucidate the clinical significance of measuring autoantibodies against incretins in diabetes. We enrolled 274 patients with diabetes (mean age ± standard deviation [SD]: 63.1 ± 12.1 years) and 109 healthy controls (mean age: 58.0 ± 5.8 years). Titers of autoantibodies against incretins (glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide and glucagon-like peptide-1) were measured using an amplified luminescent proximity homogeneous assay-linked immunosorbent assay. Both incretin antibody titers were significantly higher in patients with diabetes than in healthy controls (both P < 0.01). A mean 4.9-year (maximum 10-year) follow-up study revealed that patients who tested positive for glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide antibodies had significantly worse prognoses than those who tested negative (P = 0.0072). Patients who tested positive for glucagon-like peptide-1 antibodies also tended to have worse prognoses (P = 0.06). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate autoantibodies against incretin hormones in patients with diabetes. These autoantibodies may serve as novel prognostic biomarkers and provide a rationale for further studies on incretin-based therapies.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Chiba University (JP), Chiba University Hospital (JP), Memorial Foundation (US), Teikyo University Chiba Medical Center (JP), Japanese Red Cross Asahikawa Hospital (JP), International University of Health and Welfare (JP)
Japan Science and Technology Agency
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Diabetes Treatment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.