Machine learning models for predicting localized thermal resistance of firefighting gloves: A comparative study

Optimizing thermal comfort for gloves requires precise predictions of localized thermal resistance ( R ct ), yet traditional experimental methods are costly and limited in capturing complex interactions. This study developed a computational framework employing Bayesian-optimized machine learning models, including multiple linear regression (MLR), decision tree (DT), generalized additive model (GAM), support vector regression (SVR), and deep learning (DL), to predict localized R ct of firefighting gloves. Utilizing 1680 measurements from firefighting gloves, predictive accuracy and stability were evaluated. DL demonstrated the highest predictive accuracy ( R ² = 0.924690, mean absolute error [MAE] = 0.009970), closely followed by SVR ( R ² = 0.913098, MAE = 0.011209) and GAM ( R ² = 0.909959, MAE = 0.011472), whereas DT and MLR exhibited lower accuracy. Response surface analysis revealed that GAM provides consistent and interpretable predictions in sparse data contexts; DL captures detailed, complex interactions but requires careful management of potential overfitting; SVR represents an intermediate choice, balancing nonlinear accuracy with smoothness but still vulnerable to occasional nonphysical predictions in sparse data scenarios. Key predictors were air layer thickness, glove thickness, wind speed, glove section, and surface area. Thermal resistance increased consistently with air layer thickness, whereas higher wind speeds reduced insulation. Predictions highlighted the little finger as the most critical region, with R ct decreasing from 0.145 to 0.112 K m 2 /W as the wind speed increased from 0 to 2 m/s. Future studies should incorporate experimental validation under realistic firefighting scenarios, expand dataset diversity, and apply physically constrained models to enhance prediction robustness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Textile Research Journal
Published
2025-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00405175251376696
Primary Topic
Thermoregulation and physiological responses
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Machine learning models for predicting localized thermal resistance of firefighting gloves: A comparative study

Ali Jannesari, Sixing Yu, Mingjie Zhang, Rui Li et al.
Textile Research Journal
Thermoregulation and physiological responses
article

Machine learning models for predicting localized thermal resistance of firefighting gloves: A comparative study

Ali Jannesari, Sixing Yu, Mingjie Zhang, Rui Li, Guowen Song, Jie Yang, Yulin Wu, Fan Zhou
article en

Abstract

Optimizing thermal comfort for gloves requires precise predictions of localized thermal resistance ( R ct ), yet traditional experimental methods are costly and limited in capturing complex interactions. This study developed a computational framework employing Bayesian-optimized machine learning models, including multiple linear regression (MLR), decision tree (DT), generalized additive model (GAM), support vector regression (SVR), and deep learning (DL), to predict localized R ct of firefighting gloves. Utilizing 1680 measurements from firefighting gloves, predictive accuracy and stability were evaluated. DL demonstrated the highest predictive accuracy ( R ² = 0.924690, mean absolute error [MAE] = 0.009970), closely followed by SVR ( R ² = 0.913098, MAE = 0.011209) and GAM ( R ² = 0.909959, MAE = 0.011472), whereas DT and MLR exhibited lower accuracy. Response surface analysis revealed that GAM provides consistent and interpretable predictions in sparse data contexts; DL captures detailed, complex interactions but requires careful management of potential overfitting; SVR represents an intermediate choice, balancing nonlinear accuracy with smoothness but still vulnerable to occasional nonphysical predictions in sparse data scenarios. Key predictors were air layer thickness, glove thickness, wind speed, glove section, and surface area. Thermal resistance increased consistently with air layer thickness, whereas higher wind speeds reduced insulation. Predictions highlighted the little finger as the most critical region, with R ct decreasing from 0.145 to 0.112 K m 2 /W as the wind speed increased from 0 to 2 m/s. Future studies should incorporate experimental validation under realistic firefighting scenarios, expand dataset diversity, and apply physically constrained models to enhance prediction robustness.

Textile Research Journal
Iowa State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Thermoregulation and physiological responses
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.