How Does the Precursor Influence the Li‐Rich Layered Oxide Cathode?

As a fundamental determinant of Li-ion battery (LIB) cathode performance and production scalability/feasibility, selection and optimization of precursors represent an essential challenge for the commercialization of layered oxide cathodes. However, for lithium-rich layered oxide (LRLO) cathodes, the overwhelming majority of laboratory research has rigidly continued to employ carbonate precursors for further modifications while ignoring the potential of hydroxide precursors, which have been undisputedly utilized as commercial precursors for large-scale production of nickel-cobalt-manganese oxide (NCM) cathodes. This bias toward precursor selection seriously impedes the practical application of the LRLO cathode and largely wastes the resources of lab-scale scientific research. Herein, through comparative analysis, the structure-property relationship between carbonate precursor-derived (CO3-) and hydroxide precursor-derived (OH-) LRLO cathodes was established, elucidating the significance of particle architectural features, especially primary-particle stacking density (PSD). Specifically, the lower PSD of the CO3-LRLO cathode facilitates Li⁺ diffusion by enriching the electrolyte-infiltrated ionic transport pathway but introduces cracks that reduce the volumetric energy density and interfacial/thermal stability. In contrast, the higher PSD of the OH-LRLO cathode improves structural integrity by enhancing the covalent environment, layered structure, and particle architecture. Moreover, multiple optimization approaches have been proposed and implemented (e.g., electrolyte engineering, lattice doping, and blending strategies) to mitigate inherent drawbacks derived from various precursors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
Published
2025-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202518277
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Advancements in Battery Materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.19
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Does the Precursor Influence the Li‐Rich Layered Oxide Cathode?

Yawen Yan, Yonglin Tang, Yizhen Huang, Yongchen Wang et al.
3 citations
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
Advancements in Battery Materials
2.19
article

How Does the Precursor Influence the Li‐Rich Layered Oxide Cathode?

Yawen Yan, Yonglin Tang, Yizhen Huang, Yongchen Wang, Tian Qiu, Chunpu Li, Baodan Zhang, Yuan Tian, Jun Bao, Kang Zhang, Yu Qiao, Shi‐Gang Sun, Yilong Chen, Chu-Xiong Ding, Yue Zou, Xin Sun, Wenbin Tu, Junhao Wang, Lianpeng Li
article en
3 citations

Abstract

As a fundamental determinant of Li-ion battery (LIB) cathode performance and production scalability/feasibility, selection and optimization of precursors represent an essential challenge for the commercialization of layered oxide cathodes. However, for lithium-rich layered oxide (LRLO) cathodes, the overwhelming majority of laboratory research has rigidly continued to employ carbonate precursors for further modifications while ignoring the potential of hydroxide precursors, which have been undisputedly utilized as commercial precursors for large-scale production of nickel-cobalt-manganese oxide (NCM) cathodes. This bias toward precursor selection seriously impedes the practical application of the LRLO cathode and largely wastes the resources of lab-scale scientific research. Herein, through comparative analysis, the structure-property relationship between carbonate precursor-derived (CO3-) and hydroxide precursor-derived (OH-) LRLO cathodes was established, elucidating the significance of particle architectural features, especially primary-particle stacking density (PSD). Specifically, the lower PSD of the CO3-LRLO cathode facilitates Li⁺ diffusion by enriching the electrolyte-infiltrated ionic transport pathway but introduces cracks that reduce the volumetric energy density and interfacial/thermal stability. In contrast, the higher PSD of the OH-LRLO cathode improves structural integrity by enhancing the covalent environment, layered structure, and particle architecture. Moreover, multiple optimization approaches have been proposed and implemented (e.g., electrolyte engineering, lattice doping, and blending strategies) to mitigate inherent drawbacks derived from various precursors.

Angewandte Chemie International EditionVol. 64(52)
Chongqing University (CN), Xiamen University (CN), Battery Park (US), Quzhou College of Technology (CN), China Automotive Battery Research Institute (CN), Hunan Xiangdian Test Research Institute (China) (CN), National Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory (CN), Tan Kah Kee Innovation Laboratory (CN), Collaborative Innovation Center of Chemistry for Energy Materials (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Advancements in Battery Materials
2.19
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.