Totalitarian Regimes and the Standardization of Aesthetic Taste

This study examines the mechanisms through which totalitarian regimes manipulate‎aesthetic taste to consolidate ideological control and enforce political ‎compliance. Drawing on comparative case studies of Nazi Germany, the‎ Soviet Union, Maoist China, North Korea, Fascist Italy, and other authoritarian ‎systems, the research demonstrates how such regimes strategically leverage ‎cultural, artistic, and aesthetic domains to construct homogenized narratives ‎aligned with their ideological imperatives. Theoretical engagement with‎ the works of Kant, Schopenhauer, Nietzsche, Adorno, Sontag, Rancière, and ‎others illuminates both the philosophical foundations and practical manifestations‎ of aesthetic standardization. The analysis further explores modes of‎ resistance that have contested such homogenization, including avant-garde ‎artistic movements, subcultural formations, individual acts of defiance, and‎ alternative aesthetic frameworks. By synthesizing historical evidence with interdisciplinary ‎theory, this study contributes to scholarly discourse on the intersection ‎of ideology, power, and aesthetics in totalitarian systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Politička misao
Published
2025-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20901/pm.62.2.02
Primary Topic
Critical Theory and Political Philosophy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Totalitarian Regimes and the Standardization of Aesthetic Taste

Leith Mzahim Khudhyer
Politička misao
Critical Theory and Political Philosophy
article

Totalitarian Regimes and the Standardization of Aesthetic Taste

Leith Mzahim Khudhyer
article en

Abstract

This study examines the mechanisms through which totalitarian regimes manipulate‎aesthetic taste to consolidate ideological control and enforce political ‎compliance. Drawing on comparative case studies of Nazi Germany, the‎ Soviet Union, Maoist China, North Korea, Fascist Italy, and other authoritarian ‎systems, the research demonstrates how such regimes strategically leverage ‎cultural, artistic, and aesthetic domains to construct homogenized narratives ‎aligned with their ideological imperatives. Theoretical engagement with‎ the works of Kant, Schopenhauer, Nietzsche, Adorno, Sontag, Rancière, and ‎others illuminates both the philosophical foundations and practical manifestations‎ of aesthetic standardization. The analysis further explores modes of‎ resistance that have contested such homogenization, including avant-garde ‎artistic movements, subcultural formations, individual acts of defiance, and‎ alternative aesthetic frameworks. By synthesizing historical evidence with interdisciplinary ‎theory, this study contributes to scholarly discourse on the intersection ‎of ideology, power, and aesthetics in totalitarian systems.

Politička misaoVol. 62(2)
University of Mosul (IQ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Critical Theory and Political Philosophy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.