Economic Feasibility of Flame-Retardant Treatment (FRT) in Residential Buildings

This study evaluated the economic feasibility of flame-retardant treatment (FRT) in residential buildings by applying a dual analytical framework that integrates cost–benefit analysis and social net benefit. According to the National Fire Data System, residential facilities accounted for 27% of all fires over the past three years, with a casualty rate approximately 1.8 times higher than the national average. Although the average FRT cost per 84 m² unit was approximately KRW 510,000, the expected damage reduction amounted to approximately KRW 8.4 million, yielding a benefit–cost ratio of 16. Furthermore, reducing residential fire fatality rates to the national average generated an additional social benefit of KRW 65 million per incident. Sensitivity analysis with a 20-year horizon and discount rates of 3∼5% confirmed that the net present value remained consistently positive. These findings demonstrate that FRT provides not only economic but also social benefits, particularly in protecting vulnerable populations.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Fire Science and Engineering
Published
2025-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7731/kifse.f9f7497e
Primary Topic
Fire effects on ecosystems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Economic Feasibility of Flame-Retardant Treatment (FRT) in Residential Buildings

Yonghui An, Sunnie Haam
Fire Science and Engineering
Fire effects on ecosystems
article

Economic Feasibility of Flame-Retardant Treatment (FRT) in Residential Buildings

Yonghui An, Sunnie Haam
article en

Abstract

This study evaluated the economic feasibility of flame-retardant treatment (FRT) in residential buildings by applying a dual analytical framework that integrates cost–benefit analysis and social net benefit. According to the National Fire Data System, residential facilities accounted for 27% of all fires over the past three years, with a casualty rate approximately 1.8 times higher than the national average. Although the average FRT cost per 84 m² unit was approximately KRW 510,000, the expected damage reduction amounted to approximately KRW 8.4 million, yielding a benefit–cost ratio of 16. Furthermore, reducing residential fire fatality rates to the national average generated an additional social benefit of KRW 65 million per incident. Sensitivity analysis with a 20-year horizon and discount rates of 3∼5% confirmed that the net present value remained consistently positive. These findings demonstrate that FRT provides not only economic but also social benefits, particularly in protecting vulnerable populations.

Fire Science and EngineeringVol. 39(5)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Fire effects on ecosystems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.