Corporate carbon performance metrics in academia: overcoming carbon accounting issues

Abstract The private sector plays crucial role in achieving the climate goals of the Paris Agreement. It is not surprising that in recent years, academic interest at the interface of climate change and management accelerated. Many researchers are working on understanding important relationships between corporate carbon performance and corporate governance factors, as well as linkages between carbon and financial performance. Understanding the determinants and consequences of corporate climate action is highly relevant, especially in times where corporate sustainability is increasingly under scrutiny. Reliable scientific results require robust and consistent underlying data and metrics for measurement. Corporate carbon performance data is required which is comparable, meaningful and clearly defined. Based on a comprehensive systematic literature review, this study sets out to explore the evolution and application of corporate carbon performance metrics over time used in empirical management research. The in-depth analysis discusses the current application of various metrics and their different characteristics, such as emission scopes, types of greenhouse gases covered, and the metrics themselves. Moreover, the underlying data sources from third party providers are critically examined. Based on the findings, future research avenues and recommendations for standardizing carbon performance metrics used in academia are presented, aiming to improve the comparability of study results amongst researchers when working with corporate Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emission performance data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Management Review Quarterly
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-025-00564-y
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.23
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Corporate carbon performance metrics in academia: overcoming carbon accounting issues

Andreas Dutzi, Sarah Stachelscheid
1 citations
Management Review Quarterly
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
2.23
article

Corporate carbon performance metrics in academia: overcoming carbon accounting issues

Andreas Dutzi, Sarah Stachelscheid
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract The private sector plays crucial role in achieving the climate goals of the Paris Agreement. It is not surprising that in recent years, academic interest at the interface of climate change and management accelerated. Many researchers are working on understanding important relationships between corporate carbon performance and corporate governance factors, as well as linkages between carbon and financial performance. Understanding the determinants and consequences of corporate climate action is highly relevant, especially in times where corporate sustainability is increasingly under scrutiny. Reliable scientific results require robust and consistent underlying data and metrics for measurement. Corporate carbon performance data is required which is comparable, meaningful and clearly defined. Based on a comprehensive systematic literature review, this study sets out to explore the evolution and application of corporate carbon performance metrics over time used in empirical management research. The in-depth analysis discusses the current application of various metrics and their different characteristics, such as emission scopes, types of greenhouse gases covered, and the metrics themselves. Moreover, the underlying data sources from third party providers are critically examined. Based on the findings, future research avenues and recommendations for standardizing carbon performance metrics used in academia are presented, aiming to improve the comparability of study results amongst researchers when working with corporate Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emission performance data.

Management Review Quarterly
University of Siegen (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
2.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.