Program Evaluation in Religious Domain: A Systematic Mapping and Analysis of Academic Literature

Program evaluation helps improve or determine the merit or worth of activities with goals to achieve. However, it remains uncertain whether religious communities fully leverage program evaluation to enhance their initiatives or make more informed decisions. This research aims to explore the current status of program evaluation within religious communities and analyze discussions concerning the characteristics of evaluations, including their purpose, evaluand (programs being evaluated), and methods. By systematically mapping the academic literature on religion, we identified 182 peer-reviewed articles related to program evaluation in this context and used these articles as samples. Quantitative content analysis reveals findings that indicate a growing academic interest in program evaluation within the religious domain. They also highlight several field-specific traits: 1) most evaluations are associated with educational programs; 2) the need to assess the outcomes or impacts of a program often drives the evaluation process; and 3) quantitative research methods are the most commonly used approach. This study represents a groundbreaking effort to explore the relationship between religion and evaluation within academic literature. It adds insights into current evaluation practices in religious contexts and encourages interdisciplinary discussions to enhance the evaluation culture in this field.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Review of Religious Research
Published
2025-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/0034673x251379033
Primary Topic
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Program Evaluation in Religious Domain: A Systematic Mapping and Analysis of Academic Literature

Vy Cao, Injae Son
Review of Religious Research
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
article

Program Evaluation in Religious Domain: A Systematic Mapping and Analysis of Academic Literature

Vy Cao, Injae Son
article en

Abstract

Program evaluation helps improve or determine the merit or worth of activities with goals to achieve. However, it remains uncertain whether religious communities fully leverage program evaluation to enhance their initiatives or make more informed decisions. This research aims to explore the current status of program evaluation within religious communities and analyze discussions concerning the characteristics of evaluations, including their purpose, evaluand (programs being evaluated), and methods. By systematically mapping the academic literature on religion, we identified 182 peer-reviewed articles related to program evaluation in this context and used these articles as samples. Quantitative content analysis reveals findings that indicate a growing academic interest in program evaluation within the religious domain. They also highlight several field-specific traits: 1) most evaluations are associated with educational programs; 2) the need to assess the outcomes or impacts of a program often drives the evaluation process; and 3) quantitative research methods are the most commonly used approach. This study represents a groundbreaking effort to explore the relationship between religion and evaluation within academic literature. It adds insights into current evaluation practices in religious contexts and encourages interdisciplinary discussions to enhance the evaluation culture in this field.

Review of Religious Research
La Sierra University (US), Western Michigan University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.