False start: Non-compliance with Victoria’s new Mental Health and Wellbeing Act

ObjectiveTo assess the compliance of Victorian designated mental health services (DMHS) with mental health and wellbeing principles under section 23 of the <i>Mental Health and Wellbeing Act 2022</i> (Vic).MethodAn audit of 19 Victorian DMHS' annual reports to assess compliance with a duty to report actions on one or more mental health and wellbeing principles (principles) within the last year.Results16 of 19 (84.2%) of designated mental health services breached their duty to report on how they complied with one or more principles within the last year. The three compliant services provided varied responses to this duty.ConclusionsThe vast majority of Victorian DMHS have failed to comply with a minimum reporting requirement under the MHWA. This data suggests that imprecise legislative drafting, an inadequate commissioning and regulatory framework as well as under-enforcement by the Mental Health and Wellbeing Commission may have contributed to non-compliance. Further research may examine how regulatory oversight agencies can ensure greater compliance with human rights and the MHWA.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Australasian Psychiatry
Published
2025-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10398562251383760
Primary Topic
Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

False start: Non-compliance with Victoria’s new Mental Health and Wellbeing Act

Simon Katterl
Australasian Psychiatry
Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
article

False start: Non-compliance with Victoria’s new Mental Health and Wellbeing Act

Simon Katterl
article en

Abstract

ObjectiveTo assess the compliance of Victorian designated mental health services (DMHS) with mental health and wellbeing principles under section 23 of the <i>Mental Health and Wellbeing Act 2022</i> (Vic).MethodAn audit of 19 Victorian DMHS' annual reports to assess compliance with a duty to report actions on one or more mental health and wellbeing principles (principles) within the last year.Results16 of 19 (84.2%) of designated mental health services breached their duty to report on how they complied with one or more principles within the last year. The three compliant services provided varied responses to this duty.ConclusionsThe vast majority of Victorian DMHS have failed to comply with a minimum reporting requirement under the MHWA. This data suggests that imprecise legislative drafting, an inadequate commissioning and regulatory framework as well as under-enforcement by the Mental Health and Wellbeing Commission may have contributed to non-compliance. Further research may examine how regulatory oversight agencies can ensure greater compliance with human rights and the MHWA.

Australasian Psychiatry
PA Consulting Group (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

False start: Non-compliance with Victoria’s new Mental Health and Wellbeing Act — Simon Katterl · Australasian Psychiatry (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS