Evaluating evidence behind popular trauma narratives: neurobiological and treatment claims in <i>The Body Keeps the Score</i>

Bessel van der Kolk's book <i>The Body Keeps the Score</i> has maintained exceptional cultural and clinical influence since its publication in 2014, remaining a best-seller and shaping public discourse on trauma. Its central claims - that trauma causes lasting neurobiological damage and that body-based treatments are uniquely effective - have been widely embraced but seldom subjected to systematic critical evaluation in peer-reviewed literature. This commentary synthesises the evidentiary basis for these claims as a counterweight to an influential narrative. It situates these findings within broader discussions of neuroscience framing, cultural appeal and evidence-based communication, underscoring the need for rigorous, balanced engagement with widely disseminated mental health narratives.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BJPsych Bulletin
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1192/bjb.2025.10174
Primary Topic
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating evidence behind popular trauma narratives: neurobiological and treatment claims in The Body Keeps the Score

Michael S. Scheeringa
BJPsych Bulletin
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
article

Evaluating evidence behind popular trauma narratives: neurobiological and treatment claims in The Body Keeps the Score

Michael S. Scheeringa
article en

Abstract

Bessel van der Kolk's book <i>The Body Keeps the Score</i> has maintained exceptional cultural and clinical influence since its publication in 2014, remaining a best-seller and shaping public discourse on trauma. Its central claims - that trauma causes lasting neurobiological damage and that body-based treatments are uniquely effective - have been widely embraced but seldom subjected to systematic critical evaluation in peer-reviewed literature. This commentary synthesises the evidentiary basis for these claims as a counterweight to an influential narrative. It situates these findings within broader discussions of neuroscience framing, cultural appeal and evidence-based communication, underscoring the need for rigorous, balanced engagement with widely disseminated mental health narratives.

BJPsych Bulletin
Tulane University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.