Comparing mixed reality use in ecologically distinct urban sites: embodied tools for participatory environmental design

Mixed reality (MR) environments offer new opportunities for embodied interaction in participatory design processes. This study evaluates whether mobile MR tools influence ecological awareness and co-design behavior across two distinct urban settings. Twenty participants from architecture and design disciplines took part in structured workshops involving MR-supported design tasks. Sessions were conducted in a spatially bounded university courtyard and on a semi-natural coastal island. Both sites were selected for their differing environmental characteristics, allowing a comparative assessment of MR’s effectiveness under varied ecological conditions. Participants used mobile augmented reality interfaces to visualize and situate ecological design proposals, including tree-based structures, habitat-supportive elements, and spatial overlays oriented toward nonhuman actors. Observational logs, post-session surveys, and coded design artifacts were used to evaluate behavior. Ninety percent of island participants and seventy percent of courtyard participants integrated ecological elements into their final designs. Reflections revealed more frequent references to nonhuman spatial actors among island participants. Reported cognitive fatigue and difficulty using the MR interface were higher in the island group, with 60 percent citing spatial or interface overload. Half of the participants also expressed uncertainty about authorship and the persistence of their digital contributions. These findings suggest that MR interfaces can support multispecies engagement and participatory ecological design, but their effectiveness depends on the sensory density, narrative framing, and infrastructural legibility of the spatial context. The results provide preliminary evidence that MR can function as a perceptual and participatory tool for inclusive environmental design under specific spatial and cognitive conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Virtual Reality
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/frvir.2025.1628312
Primary Topic
Augmented Reality Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing mixed reality use in ecologically distinct urban sites: embodied tools for participatory environmental design

Ethem Gürer, Kaan Karabagli
Frontiers in Virtual Reality
Augmented Reality Applications
article

Comparing mixed reality use in ecologically distinct urban sites: embodied tools for participatory environmental design

Ethem Gürer, Kaan Karabagli
article en

Abstract

Mixed reality (MR) environments offer new opportunities for embodied interaction in participatory design processes. This study evaluates whether mobile MR tools influence ecological awareness and co-design behavior across two distinct urban settings. Twenty participants from architecture and design disciplines took part in structured workshops involving MR-supported design tasks. Sessions were conducted in a spatially bounded university courtyard and on a semi-natural coastal island. Both sites were selected for their differing environmental characteristics, allowing a comparative assessment of MR’s effectiveness under varied ecological conditions. Participants used mobile augmented reality interfaces to visualize and situate ecological design proposals, including tree-based structures, habitat-supportive elements, and spatial overlays oriented toward nonhuman actors. Observational logs, post-session surveys, and coded design artifacts were used to evaluate behavior. Ninety percent of island participants and seventy percent of courtyard participants integrated ecological elements into their final designs. Reflections revealed more frequent references to nonhuman spatial actors among island participants. Reported cognitive fatigue and difficulty using the MR interface were higher in the island group, with 60 percent citing spatial or interface overload. Half of the participants also expressed uncertainty about authorship and the persistence of their digital contributions. These findings suggest that MR interfaces can support multispecies engagement and participatory ecological design, but their effectiveness depends on the sensory density, narrative framing, and infrastructural legibility of the spatial context. The results provide preliminary evidence that MR can function as a perceptual and participatory tool for inclusive environmental design under specific spatial and cognitive conditions.

Frontiers in Virtual RealityVol. 6
Istanbul Technical University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Augmented Reality Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparing mixed reality use in ecologically distinct urban sites: embodied tools for participatory environmental design — Ethem Gürer, Kaan Karabagli · Frontiers in Virtual Reality (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS