Biological recycling theory: a cyclic network framework for evolutionary innovation and recovery

Introduction Life’s macroevolutionary patterns—rapid post-extinction recoveries and bursts of novelty—are not fully explained by mutation and vertical descent alone. I introduce Biological Recycling Theory (BRT), a cyclic, network-based framework. Methods An agent-based model compared four scenarios (classical, cryptic-only, HGT-only, full BRT), with extinction pulses and explicit constraints on DNA uptake/compatibility; code and runs are archived. Results Under 50% extinction, BRT restored ~90% of pre-event diversity in ~⅓ fewer generations than classical models and yielded ~3,600 novel genotype combinations (vs. ~2,800 cryptic-only; ~700 HGT-only; ~0 mutation-only). Longer eDNA half-life increased diversity retention and innovation. Discussion BRT integrates balancing selection, cryptic genetic variation, and genetic recycling via HGT/eDNA to expand the effective genetic search space across time, offering a testable framework for macroevolutionary resilience. Conclusion Evolution is better modeled as a cyclic network, where alleles circulate across populations, environments, and time, complementing Darwinian microevolution.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2025.1641717
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.82
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Biological recycling theory: a cyclic network framework for evolutionary innovation and recovery

Sameh Mesallum
1 citations
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
1.82
article

Biological recycling theory: a cyclic network framework for evolutionary innovation and recovery

Sameh Mesallum
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Introduction Life’s macroevolutionary patterns—rapid post-extinction recoveries and bursts of novelty—are not fully explained by mutation and vertical descent alone. I introduce Biological Recycling Theory (BRT), a cyclic, network-based framework. Methods An agent-based model compared four scenarios (classical, cryptic-only, HGT-only, full BRT), with extinction pulses and explicit constraints on DNA uptake/compatibility; code and runs are archived. Results Under 50% extinction, BRT restored ~90% of pre-event diversity in ~⅓ fewer generations than classical models and yielded ~3,600 novel genotype combinations (vs. ~2,800 cryptic-only; ~700 HGT-only; ~0 mutation-only). Longer eDNA half-life increased diversity retention and innovation. Discussion BRT integrates balancing selection, cryptic genetic variation, and genetic recycling via HGT/eDNA to expand the effective genetic search space across time, offering a testable framework for macroevolutionary resilience. Conclusion Evolution is better modeled as a cyclic network, where alleles circulate across populations, environments, and time, complementing Darwinian microevolution.

Frontiers in Ecology and EvolutionVol. 13
Tufts University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
1.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.