Impact of different forest types on soil microbial biomass and microbial entropy in the karst region of southwestern China

Soil microbial biomass and microbial entropy are used as important indicators of soil quality. However, the effects of forest-stand types remain poorly understood. This study focused on three stands of Cryptomeria japonica var. sinensis (CJ), Liquidambar formosana (LF), and their mixed forests (CL) in Guizhou Province, China. Soil samples were collected from three depths to investigate variations in soil microbial biomass C, N, P (MBC, MBN, MBP), as well as microbial entropy C, N, P (qMBC, qMBN, qMBP) among different forest stands. Additionally, the influence of soil organic C (SOC), total N (TN), total P (TP), and their stoichiometry, along with soil microbial C:N:P stoichiometry and soil-microbial stoichiometric imbalances on soil microbial biomass and microbial entropy are analyzed. The variance analysis revealed, compared to pure stands, the mixed forest exhibited significantly higher MBC (38.84%), MBC stocks (46.72%), MBC/MBN (52.23%), MBC/MBP (52.23%), and qMBC (23.49%; <i>p</i> < 0.05). Pure stand LF showed approximately 30% higher soil microbial stoichiometric imbalances (C/N<sub>imb</sub>, C/P<sub>imb</sub>, and N/P<sub>imb</sub>) than the other two stand types (<i>p</i> < 0.05). While the pure CJ stand exhibited significantly higher qMBN and qMBP (19.62% and 17.26%, respectively; <i>p</i> < 0.05). MBC, MBN, MBP, and their storage decreased significantly with increasing soil depth (<i>p</i> < 0.05), no significant effect on microbial stoichiometric ratios or microbial entropy. Correlation and redundancy analyses demonstrated that MBC, MBN, and MBP were highly significantly positively correlated with SOC, TN, and TP contents (<i>p</i> < 0.01), whereas qMBC and qMBN exhibited highly significant negative correlations with SOC, TP, SOC/TP, TN/TP, C/P<sub>imb</sub>, and N/P<sub>imb</sub> (<i>p</i> < 0.01). Soil TP and MBC/MBP were identified as the primary factors influencing soil microbial biomass variation, with explanatory rates of 42.8% and 14.8%, respectively. Furthermore, C/N<sub>imb</sub> and C/P<sub>imb</sub> emerged as key determinants affecting microbial entropy dynamics, accounting for 31.5% and 14.2% of the observed variation, respectively. This study provided valuable data and insights for developing mixed forest management strategies in karst areas.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Plant Science
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2025.1678667
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.19
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of different forest types on soil microbial biomass and microbial entropy in the karst region of southwestern China

Yan Wu, Xiaoli Zhong, Bo Ding, Yang Liu et al.
1 citations
Frontiers in Plant Science
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
1.19
article

Impact of different forest types on soil microbial biomass and microbial entropy in the karst region of southwestern China

Yan Wu, Xiaoli Zhong, Bo Ding, Yang Liu, Yunlin Zhang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Soil microbial biomass and microbial entropy are used as important indicators of soil quality. However, the effects of forest-stand types remain poorly understood. This study focused on three stands of Cryptomeria japonica var. sinensis (CJ), Liquidambar formosana (LF), and their mixed forests (CL) in Guizhou Province, China. Soil samples were collected from three depths to investigate variations in soil microbial biomass C, N, P (MBC, MBN, MBP), as well as microbial entropy C, N, P (qMBC, qMBN, qMBP) among different forest stands. Additionally, the influence of soil organic C (SOC), total N (TN), total P (TP), and their stoichiometry, along with soil microbial C:N:P stoichiometry and soil-microbial stoichiometric imbalances on soil microbial biomass and microbial entropy are analyzed. The variance analysis revealed, compared to pure stands, the mixed forest exhibited significantly higher MBC (38.84%), MBC stocks (46.72%), MBC/MBN (52.23%), MBC/MBP (52.23%), and qMBC (23.49%; <i>p</i> < 0.05). Pure stand LF showed approximately 30% higher soil microbial stoichiometric imbalances (C/N<sub>imb</sub>, C/P<sub>imb</sub>, and N/P<sub>imb</sub>) than the other two stand types (<i>p</i> < 0.05). While the pure CJ stand exhibited significantly higher qMBN and qMBP (19.62% and 17.26%, respectively; <i>p</i> < 0.05). MBC, MBN, MBP, and their storage decreased significantly with increasing soil depth (<i>p</i> < 0.05), no significant effect on microbial stoichiometric ratios or microbial entropy. Correlation and redundancy analyses demonstrated that MBC, MBN, and MBP were highly significantly positively correlated with SOC, TN, and TP contents (<i>p</i> < 0.01), whereas qMBC and qMBN exhibited highly significant negative correlations with SOC, TP, SOC/TP, TN/TP, C/P<sub>imb</sub>, and N/P<sub>imb</sub> (<i>p</i> < 0.01). Soil TP and MBC/MBP were identified as the primary factors influencing soil microbial biomass variation, with explanatory rates of 42.8% and 14.8%, respectively. Furthermore, C/N<sub>imb</sub> and C/P<sub>imb</sub> emerged as key determinants affecting microbial entropy dynamics, accounting for 31.5% and 14.2% of the observed variation, respectively. This study provided valuable data and insights for developing mixed forest management strategies in karst areas.

Frontiers in Plant ScienceVol. 16
Guizhou University (CN), Guizhou Education University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
1.19
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.