LINGUISTIC PERSPECTIVES ON ENGLISH TEACHERS’ PERCEPTIONS OF CULTURALLY RESPONSIVE TEACHING

Culturally Responsive Teaching (CRT) has been recognized as an effective pedagogical approach that integrates students’ cultural backgrounds into the learning process, yet limited research in Indonesia has examined English teachers’ perceptions of CRT through a linguistic lens. This study explores how junior high school English teachers in Klaten perceive and discursively construct CRT in their classrooms. Employing a qualitative design, data were collected through semi-structured interviews with six English teachers of diverse backgrounds, and analyzed using Miles and Huberman’s interactive model, focusing both on thematic content and linguistic markers such as lexical choices, metaphors, and stance-taking. The findings reveal three patterns of teachers’ understanding: some framed CRT as a teaching method, others as a broader educational approach, while one admitted unfamiliarity with the concept. These perceptions were linguistically constructed through markers of uncertainty (e.g., interrogatives, hedges), evaluative and metaphorical language (e.g., “learning asset”), and stance-taking devices that reflected confidence or hesitation. In implementation, teachers integrated CRT through project-based learning, local cultural narratives, and school routines, though coherence varied depending on their conceptual grounding. Obstacles included limited teacher competence, insufficient facilities, students’ cultural identity resistance to English, and low self-confidence, while strategies involved professional development, use of technology, relationship building, and material adaptation. The study concludes that teachers’ discourse both reflects and shapes their engagement with CRT, and that without strong theoretical foundations, practices risk remaining intuitive rather than systematic. It recommends strengthening professional development programs to combine theoretical understanding and practical strategies, thereby supporting more inclusive and culturally grounded English language teaching in Indonesia.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Lire Journal (Journal of Linguistics and Literature)
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33019/lire.v9i3.532
Primary Topic
Global Education and Multiculturalism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

LINGUISTIC PERSPECTIVES ON ENGLISH TEACHERS’ PERCEPTIONS OF CULTURALLY RESPONSIVE TEACHING

Hepy Adityarini, Ani Ayu Sariningsih
Lire Journal (Journal of Linguistics and Literature)
Global Education and Multiculturalism
article

LINGUISTIC PERSPECTIVES ON ENGLISH TEACHERS’ PERCEPTIONS OF CULTURALLY RESPONSIVE TEACHING

Hepy Adityarini, Ani Ayu Sariningsih
article en

Abstract

Culturally Responsive Teaching (CRT) has been recognized as an effective pedagogical approach that integrates students’ cultural backgrounds into the learning process, yet limited research in Indonesia has examined English teachers’ perceptions of CRT through a linguistic lens. This study explores how junior high school English teachers in Klaten perceive and discursively construct CRT in their classrooms. Employing a qualitative design, data were collected through semi-structured interviews with six English teachers of diverse backgrounds, and analyzed using Miles and Huberman’s interactive model, focusing both on thematic content and linguistic markers such as lexical choices, metaphors, and stance-taking. The findings reveal three patterns of teachers’ understanding: some framed CRT as a teaching method, others as a broader educational approach, while one admitted unfamiliarity with the concept. These perceptions were linguistically constructed through markers of uncertainty (e.g., interrogatives, hedges), evaluative and metaphorical language (e.g., “learning asset”), and stance-taking devices that reflected confidence or hesitation. In implementation, teachers integrated CRT through project-based learning, local cultural narratives, and school routines, though coherence varied depending on their conceptual grounding. Obstacles included limited teacher competence, insufficient facilities, students’ cultural identity resistance to English, and low self-confidence, while strategies involved professional development, use of technology, relationship building, and material adaptation. The study concludes that teachers’ discourse both reflects and shapes their engagement with CRT, and that without strong theoretical foundations, practices risk remaining intuitive rather than systematic. It recommends strengthening professional development programs to combine theoretical understanding and practical strategies, thereby supporting more inclusive and culturally grounded English language teaching in Indonesia.

Lire Journal (Journal of Linguistics and Literature)Vol. 9(3)
Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Global Education and Multiculturalism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.