Institutional mechanisms and audit shari’ahness in Nigeria

Purpose This study aims to examine audit shari’ahness among Nigerian Islamic banks (IBs). This study, upon drawing the institutional and Maqasidil shari’ah theories, investigated the relationship between institutional mechanisms and audit shari’ahness. Design/methodology/approach The study used a survey research design through the administration of a questionnaire using both nominal and Likert-scale measurement scales on a sample study of regulators financial regulation advisory council of experts (FRACE), managers of IBs, Shari’ah scholars (Advisory committee of experts ACE), internal Shari’ah auditors and other stakeholders, which include staff of the supervisory department at Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) and Nigeria Deposit Insurance Corporation (NDIC), respectively. Also, 150 samples were identified based on the population of 210, and statistical package for the social sciences (SPSS) version 25 was used to analyze the data to ensure that it is suitable for the partial least squares-structural equation modeling. Findings The findings supported all three hypothesized direct effects of institutional mechanisms of “Coercive”, “Normative” and “Mimetic” as having direct positive influences on audit shari’ahness among IBs in Nigeria. Research limitations/implications This research was unable to cover other crucial stakeholders such as customers of IBs and Halal industry, investors, local Islamic finance community (such as Islamic micro-finance banks and Islamic co-operative societies), Islamic public sectors (such as Hajj commission, Hisbah boards, Zakat and Waqaf agencies), community members, etc. Practical implications Practically, this investigation confirmed that coercive institutional mechanisms such as shari’ah principles and rules, and regulations have a significant influence on audit shari’ahness, thereby improving the managerial efficiency of IBs and thus effectively serving different sectors of the economy based on the Shari’ah rules and principles.. Originality/value The role of institutional mechanisms (coercive, normative and mimetic) in ensuring audit shari’ahness is scantily studied generally, and none in the case of Nigeria. Therefore, to the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study is the first to examine the country’s three-way relationship between institutional mechanisms (coercive, normative and mimetic) and audit shari’ahness in the context of Nigeria. Hence, this study answers the previous literature’s gaps with three independent variables (coercive, normative and mimetic) and audit shari’ahness as the criterion variable.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Islamic accounting and business research
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jiabr-11-2024-0443
Primary Topic
Islamic Finance and Banking Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Institutional mechanisms and audit shari’ahness in Nigeria

Shafi’u Abubakar Kurfi, Md Harashid Haron
Journal of Islamic accounting and business research
Islamic Finance and Banking Studies
article

Institutional mechanisms and audit shari’ahness in Nigeria

Shafi’u Abubakar Kurfi, Md Harashid Haron
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to examine audit shari’ahness among Nigerian Islamic banks (IBs). This study, upon drawing the institutional and Maqasidil shari’ah theories, investigated the relationship between institutional mechanisms and audit shari’ahness. Design/methodology/approach The study used a survey research design through the administration of a questionnaire using both nominal and Likert-scale measurement scales on a sample study of regulators financial regulation advisory council of experts (FRACE), managers of IBs, Shari’ah scholars (Advisory committee of experts ACE), internal Shari’ah auditors and other stakeholders, which include staff of the supervisory department at Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) and Nigeria Deposit Insurance Corporation (NDIC), respectively. Also, 150 samples were identified based on the population of 210, and statistical package for the social sciences (SPSS) version 25 was used to analyze the data to ensure that it is suitable for the partial least squares-structural equation modeling. Findings The findings supported all three hypothesized direct effects of institutional mechanisms of “Coercive”, “Normative” and “Mimetic” as having direct positive influences on audit shari’ahness among IBs in Nigeria. Research limitations/implications This research was unable to cover other crucial stakeholders such as customers of IBs and Halal industry, investors, local Islamic finance community (such as Islamic micro-finance banks and Islamic co-operative societies), Islamic public sectors (such as Hajj commission, Hisbah boards, Zakat and Waqaf agencies), community members, etc. Practical implications Practically, this investigation confirmed that coercive institutional mechanisms such as shari’ah principles and rules, and regulations have a significant influence on audit shari’ahness, thereby improving the managerial efficiency of IBs and thus effectively serving different sectors of the economy based on the Shari’ah rules and principles.. Originality/value The role of institutional mechanisms (coercive, normative and mimetic) in ensuring audit shari’ahness is scantily studied generally, and none in the case of Nigeria. Therefore, to the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study is the first to examine the country’s three-way relationship between institutional mechanisms (coercive, normative and mimetic) and audit shari’ahness in the context of Nigeria. Hence, this study answers the previous literature’s gaps with three independent variables (coercive, normative and mimetic) and audit shari’ahness as the criterion variable.

Journal of Islamic accounting and business research
Universiti Sains Malaysia (MY), Umaru Musa Yar'adua University (NG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Islamic Finance and Banking Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.