Learning to fear: predator recognition in giraffes is shaped by evolved sensitivity and ecological experience
Introduction Predator recognition is essential for prey survival, yet, whether responses are shaped by evolutionary predispositions or by ecological experience remains debated. Methods We tested vigilance responses of fifty-one free-ranging Southern giraffes ( Giraffa giraffa ) to controlled playbacks of lion roar-grunt sequences in two South African populations: a predator-naïve population in a reserve without lions and a predator-experienced population in a reserve where lions were reintroduced five years ago. Results Both populations oriented rapidly to lion calls, suggesting that acoustic features of lion vocalizations act as generalized danger cues. However, predator-experienced giraffes sustained vigilance ten times longer (mean ± SD: 513.34 ± 421.34 s, N = 24) compared to predator-naïve giraffes (49.06 ± 46.26 s, N = 27). Vigilance responses during lion playbacks, in general, were higher in the predator-experienced population, whereas responses to control calls did not differ between sites. Discussion These findings indicate that while immediate orientation likely reflects evolved sensitivity to acoustically harsh predator cues, the persistence of vigilance is shaped by ecological experience. Our study demonstrates that predator reintroduction can rapidly recalibrate prey risk perception, highlighting the dynamic interplay between evolved predispositions and learning in shaping antipredator responses.
Authors
- Anton Baotic (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7881-857X)
- Georgine Szipl (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5211-8201)
Institutions
- Austrian Academy of Sciences (AT)
- Acoustics Research Institute (AT)
- Institute for Globally Distributed Open Research and Education (SE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
- Published
- 2025-11-03
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2025.1634218
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 1.64