Ice sheet mass flow and balance with constituent terms 2010–19

Abstract Ice sheet mass loss is typically provided for grounded ice, because changes in floating ice are more difficult to measure and contribute minimally to sea level rise. However, gross freshwater mass flow rate across ice sheet boundaries, including floating ice, is a better metric of ice sheet health. Here, we present total mass flows across ice sheet boundaries for both the Greenlandic and Antarctic ice sheets and their peripheral glaciers from 2010 through 2019. In addition to total mass flow, we provide constituent terms and gross rather than net values, including components that combine to provide surface mass balance. Ice mass loss in Greenland is 330 $\pm$ 50 Gt yr -1 which is $\sim$ 30% larger than the 255 $\pm$ 40 Gt yr -1 grounded ice mass loss estimates that neglect floating ice changes. Ice mass loss in Antarctica is 450 $\pm$ 270 Gt yr -1 which is $\sim$ 2.4x the 190 $\pm$ 115 Gt yr -1 grounded ice mass loss estimates. Freshwater mass flow rate from Greenland is $\sim$ 1065 $\pm$ 120 Gt yr -1 or $\sim$ 3x mass loss ( $\sim$ 4x grounded mass loss), and from Antarctica is $\sim$ 3110 $\pm$ 1515 Gt yr -1 , or $\sim$ 7x mass loss ( $\sim$ 16x grounded mass loss).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Glaciology
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2025.10092
Primary Topic
Cryospheric studies and observations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ice sheet mass flow and balance with constituent terms 2010–19

Chang‐Qing Ke, Brice Van Liefferinge, Kenneth D. Mankoff, Robert S. Fausto et al.
Journal of Glaciology
Cryospheric studies and observations
article

Ice sheet mass flow and balance with constituent terms 2010–19

Chang‐Qing Ke, Brice Van Liefferinge, Kenneth D. Mankoff, Robert S. Fausto, Désirée Treichler, Thorben Döhne, Benjamin Davison, Chad A. Greene, Damien Ringeisen, William Hardy Kochtitzky, Alex Gardner, G. Wang
article en

Abstract

Abstract Ice sheet mass loss is typically provided for grounded ice, because changes in floating ice are more difficult to measure and contribute minimally to sea level rise. However, gross freshwater mass flow rate across ice sheet boundaries, including floating ice, is a better metric of ice sheet health. Here, we present total mass flows across ice sheet boundaries for both the Greenlandic and Antarctic ice sheets and their peripheral glaciers from 2010 through 2019. In addition to total mass flow, we provide constituent terms and gross rather than net values, including components that combine to provide surface mass balance. Ice mass loss in Greenland is 330 $\pm$ 50 Gt yr -1 which is $\sim$ 30% larger than the 255 $\pm$ 40 Gt yr -1 grounded ice mass loss estimates that neglect floating ice changes. Ice mass loss in Antarctica is 450 $\pm$ 270 Gt yr -1 which is $\sim$ 2.4x the 190 $\pm$ 115 Gt yr -1 grounded ice mass loss estimates. Freshwater mass flow rate from Greenland is $\sim$ 1065 $\pm$ 120 Gt yr -1 or $\sim$ 3x mass loss ( $\sim$ 4x grounded mass loss), and from Antarctica is $\sim$ 3110 $\pm$ 1515 Gt yr -1 , or $\sim$ 7x mass loss ( $\sim$ 16x grounded mass loss).

Journal of GlaciologyVol. 71
Goddard Institute for Space Studies (US), Université Libre de Bruxelles (BE), Jet Propulsion Laboratory (US), Environment and Climate Change Canada (CA), University of Liège (BE), University of Oslo (NO), Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland (DK), Integra (United States) (US), Columbia University (US), Technische Universität Dresden (DE), University of Sheffield (GB)
National Aeronautics and Space Administration, California Institute of Technology, Jet Propulsion Laboratory
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Cryospheric studies and observations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.