Diagnostic performance of quantitative measures from [18F]FDG PET/CT, [18F]FEC PET/CT, and DW-MRI in the detection of lymph node metastases in endometrial and cervical cancer: data from the MAPPING study

Quantitative measures from [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT, [<sup>18</sup>F]FEC PET/CT, or DW-MRI did not outperform visual assessment in the detection of nodal metastases in endometrial cancer. Therefore, the implementation of these quantitative measures as standalone diagnostic tools in routine clinical practice is not recommended.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-025-07587-3
Primary Topic
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Diagnostic performance of quantitative measures from [18F]FDG PET/CT, [18F]FEC PET/CT, and DW-MRI in the detection of lymph node metastases in endometrial and cervical cancer: data from the MAPPING study

Christina Fotopoulou, Victoria Warbey, Allan Hackshaw, Andrea Rockall et al.
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
article

Diagnostic performance of quantitative measures from [18F]FDG PET/CT, [18F]FEC PET/CT, and DW-MRI in the detection of lymph node metastases in endometrial and cervical cancer: data from the MAPPING study

Christina Fotopoulou, Victoria Warbey, Allan Hackshaw, Andrea Rockall, Katja N. De Paepe, William Wilson, Gary Cook, Ranjit Manchanda, Tara Barwick, Dow‐Mu Koh, Aslam Sohaib, Marc E. Miquel, Helen F. Stringfellow, Sudha Sundar, Pierre L. Martin‐Hirsch, Sadaf Ghaem‐Maghami, Benjamin King, Anju Sahdev, Nishat Bharwani, Marielle Nobbenhuis
article en

Abstract

Quantitative measures from [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT, [<sup>18</sup>F]FEC PET/CT, or DW-MRI did not outperform visual assessment in the detection of nodal metastases in endometrial cancer. Therefore, the implementation of these quantitative measures as standalone diagnostic tools in routine clinical practice is not recommended.

European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular ImagingVol. 53(4)
Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB), St Bartholomew's Hospital (GB), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US), St Thomas' Hospital (GB), Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust (GB), Queen Mary University of London (GB), King's College London (GB), Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Barts Health NHS Trust (GB), Cancer Research UK (GB), Edinburgh Cancer Research (GB), London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB), Thomas Foundation (AU), Royal Marsden Hospital (GB), NIHR Surgical Reconstruction and Microbiology Research Centre (GB), University College London (GB), Imperial College London (GB)
Cancer Research UK, Imperial College London
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.