“The impacts are not evenly distributed”: Representation and inclusion of marginalized groups in authorities’ COVID-19 communication

This article investigates the representation and inclusion of marginalized groups in authorities’ crisis communication during the COVID-19 pandemic. Taking a Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) approach, the study focuses on press releases and guidance documents published on official government websites in the United Kingdom and the United States in 2020–2023. In the analysis, I explore how specific groups of people are referenced by the authorities, and then zoom in on how marginalized groups in particular are discussed. The findings illustrate that the crisis communication in both countries acknowledges the disproportionate effects of the pandemic on marginalized people. However, the ways these effects are discussed may also contribute to discourses that harm marginalized communities by, for example, maintaining negative stereotypes. Overall, the authorities focus on the medical and economic impacts of the crisis on marginalized groups, with less emphasis on social phenomena, such as racism and discrimination.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discourse & Society
Published
2025-07-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09579265251353793
Primary Topic
Public Relations and Crisis Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“The impacts are not evenly distributed”: Representation and inclusion of marginalized groups in authorities’ COVID-19 communication

Hanna Limatius
Discourse & Society
Public Relations and Crisis Communication
article

“The impacts are not evenly distributed”: Representation and inclusion of marginalized groups in authorities’ COVID-19 communication

Hanna Limatius
article en

Abstract

This article investigates the representation and inclusion of marginalized groups in authorities’ crisis communication during the COVID-19 pandemic. Taking a Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) approach, the study focuses on press releases and guidance documents published on official government websites in the United Kingdom and the United States in 2020–2023. In the analysis, I explore how specific groups of people are referenced by the authorities, and then zoom in on how marginalized groups in particular are discussed. The findings illustrate that the crisis communication in both countries acknowledges the disproportionate effects of the pandemic on marginalized people. However, the ways these effects are discussed may also contribute to discourses that harm marginalized communities by, for example, maintaining negative stereotypes. Overall, the authorities focus on the medical and economic impacts of the crisis on marginalized groups, with less emphasis on social phenomena, such as racism and discrimination.

Discourse & Society
University of Helsinki (FI)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Public Relations and Crisis Communication
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.