Evaluation and Learning with Multiple Inaccurate True Targets

In many real-world machine learning (ML) scenarios, obtaining accurate true targets (ATTs) for evaluation and learning is difficult, expensive, or fundamentally infeasible. This article proposes a unified scientific paradigm—evaluation and learning with multiple inaccurate true targets (MIATTs)—that addresses this challenge by integrating the fundamental principles of two recently proposed frameworks: Logical Assessment Formula (LAF) and Undefinable True Target Learning (UTTL). Both LAF and UTTL operate under a relaxed but shared assumption that the true target for a given ML task is not assumed to exist as a well-defined object in the real world, which motivates us to define MIATTs formally as a collection of weak yet partially informative targets, each capturing a different aspect of the underlying true target. Building on this foundation, we establish a systematic theoretical framework encompassing MIATT generation, model construction, metric formulation, and model optimization. The article offers a principled and practical alternative for ML scenarios marked by true target ambiguity, providing a viable path where conventional ATT-based methods prove inadequate or inapplicable.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Qeios
Published
2025-07-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32388/umhefg
Primary Topic
Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation and Learning with Multiple Inaccurate True Targets

Yongquan Yang
Qeios
Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
article

Evaluation and Learning with Multiple Inaccurate True Targets

Yongquan Yang
article en

Abstract

In many real-world machine learning (ML) scenarios, obtaining accurate true targets (ATTs) for evaluation and learning is difficult, expensive, or fundamentally infeasible. This article proposes a unified scientific paradigm—evaluation and learning with multiple inaccurate true targets (MIATTs)—that addresses this challenge by integrating the fundamental principles of two recently proposed frameworks: Logical Assessment Formula (LAF) and Undefinable True Target Learning (UTTL). Both LAF and UTTL operate under a relaxed but shared assumption that the true target for a given ML task is not assumed to exist as a well-defined object in the real world, which motivates us to define MIATTs formally as a collection of weak yet partially informative targets, each capturing a different aspect of the underlying true target. Building on this foundation, we establish a systematic theoretical framework encompassing MIATT generation, model construction, metric formulation, and model optimization. The article offers a principled and practical alternative for ML scenarios marked by true target ambiguity, providing a viable path where conventional ATT-based methods prove inadequate or inapplicable.

Qeios
Art Institute of Portland (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.