From historical bias to historical insight: shifting stereotypes about Central and Eastern Europe after the invasion of Ukraine

Following Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine (2022), several Western European leaders expressed regret for previously disregarding the warnings of multiple Central and Eastern European (CEE) governments concerning the threat of Russian aggression. In the past, such warnings were seen as residual anti-Russian sentiment rooted in the region’s historical experience during communism. Borrowing from social psychology, this article proposes a novel lens to study perceptions about CEE in European Union (EU) external policy through the concept of regional stereotypes. The empirical focus is on the Council, the main institution responsible for adopting EU policy on Russia and the Eastern neighbourhood. Using an interpretive approach, the goal is to examine how Council officials perceive the position of CEE governments after the invasion, compared to earlier reports. The exploratory analysis shows an emerging transformation of stereotypes about the region, which is starting to be recognised for its historical insight into Russia. The findings highlight the justificatory role of stereotypes in multilateral negotiations and how exogenous shocks can reshape their meaning.<br>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cambridge Review of International Affairs
Published
2025-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2025.2579251
Primary Topic
European Union Policy and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From historical bias to historical insight: shifting stereotypes about Central and Eastern Europe after the invasion of Ukraine

Adina Akbik
Cambridge Review of International Affairs
European Union Policy and Governance
article

From historical bias to historical insight: shifting stereotypes about Central and Eastern Europe after the invasion of Ukraine

Adina Akbik
article en

Abstract

Following Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine (2022), several Western European leaders expressed regret for previously disregarding the warnings of multiple Central and Eastern European (CEE) governments concerning the threat of Russian aggression. In the past, such warnings were seen as residual anti-Russian sentiment rooted in the region’s historical experience during communism. Borrowing from social psychology, this article proposes a novel lens to study perceptions about CEE in European Union (EU) external policy through the concept of regional stereotypes. The empirical focus is on the Council, the main institution responsible for adopting EU policy on Russia and the Eastern neighbourhood. Using an interpretive approach, the goal is to examine how Council officials perceive the position of CEE governments after the invasion, compared to earlier reports. The exploratory analysis shows an emerging transformation of stereotypes about the region, which is starting to be recognised for its historical insight into Russia. The findings highlight the justificatory role of stereotypes in multilateral negotiations and how exogenous shocks can reshape their meaning.<br>

Cambridge Review of International Affairs
Leiden University (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
European Union Policy and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

From historical bias to historical insight: shifting stereotypes about Central and Eastern Europe after the invasion of Ukraine — Adina Akbik · Cambridge Review of International Affairs (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS