Governing AI in Mental Health: 50-State Legislative Review

State legislatures are rapidly shaping the regulatory landscape for MH-AI, but most laws treat mental health as incidental to broader artificial intelligence or health care regulation. Explicit mental health provisions remain rare, and clinician and patient perspectives are seldom incorporated into policymaking. The result is a fragmented and uneven environment that risks leaving patients unprotected and clinicians overburdened. Mental health professionals must proactively engage with legislators, professional organizations, and patient advocates to ensure that emerging frameworks address oversight, harm, autonomy, and privacy in ways that are clinically realistic, ethically sound, and supportive of flexible-but responsible-innovation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JMIR Mental Health
Published
2025-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2196/80739
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.27
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Governing AI in Mental Health: 50-State Legislative Review

Carlos A. Larrauri, John Blake Torous, Matthew Flathers, Winna Xia et al.
5 citations
JMIR Mental Health
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
3.27
article

Governing AI in Mental Health: 50-State Legislative Review

Carlos A. Larrauri, John Blake Torous, Matthew Flathers, Winna Xia, J. Nicholas Shumate, Christine Hau, Eden Rozenblit, E. Nicholas Torous
article en
5 citations

Abstract

State legislatures are rapidly shaping the regulatory landscape for MH-AI, but most laws treat mental health as incidental to broader artificial intelligence or health care regulation. Explicit mental health provisions remain rare, and clinician and patient perspectives are seldom incorporated into policymaking. The result is a fragmented and uneven environment that risks leaving patients unprotected and clinicians overburdened. Mental health professionals must proactively engage with legislators, professional organizations, and patient advocates to ensure that emerging frameworks address oversight, harm, autonomy, and privacy in ways that are clinically realistic, ethically sound, and supportive of flexible-but responsible-innovation.

JMIR Mental HealthVol. 12
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US), Harvard University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
3.27
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.