Position statement: congress must put an end to unlawful NIH grant cancellations

The National Institutes of Health (NIH) supports critical biomedical and behavioral health research conducted in the United States through grant funding every year. Recently, several NIH grants that had been awarded and passed full scientific peer review were suspended or canceled with little scientific or performance rationale. As a result of the NIH grant suspensions, important research related to Cancer, COVID-19, and mental health, among others, have been affected, with a loss of at least $643 million in funding. The grant suspensions have halted clinical trials in progress, and could be setting back important biomedical trials and research related to chronic disease, including cardiovascular disease and diabetes, which could benefit the public. While the grant cuts have been claimed to be due to a lack of scientific validity, rigor, or public benefit, these assertions are contrary to the findings of the NIH, researchers, and experts in the field who were initially involved in evaluating and awarding the grants. In order to prevent further unwarranted grant cancellations, we ask congress to consider holding oversight hearings regarding the NIH grant suspensions. Additionally, we ask that they introduce or support legislation that would help to prevent further unjustified grant suspensions and secure predictable funding for biomedical and behavioral health research. Congress must prevent the termination of NIH research grants that have already been awarded through lawful, competitive processes. Legislators must use their constitutional spending authority to ensure agencies execute appropriated funds, to ensure funding efficiency, life-saving medical innovation, and US scientific competitiveness globally. Lay summary Grants awarded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) for health research, including research on vaccines and health disparities, have been suspended after going through the process of peer review and being awarded a grant. The reasons for the grant suspensions go against the findings of the NIH on the scientific validity, importance, and benefit to the public of the research being conducted, with a lack of justification being given to congress, the researchers, or the public. To address the NIH grant cancellations and try to prevent further suspensions, we ask congress to initiate hearings focused on the grant cancellations and introduce legislation to prevent unwarranted grant cancellations in the future.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Translational Behavioral Medicine
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/tbm/ibaf070
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Science, Research, and Medicine
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.70
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Position statement: congress must put an end to unlawful NIH grant cancellations

Joanna Buscemi, Mary Takgbajouah, Alexander O’Donnell, Elise Betkowski et al.
1 citations
Translational Behavioral Medicine
Science, Research, and Medicine
1.70
article

Position statement: congress must put an end to unlawful NIH grant cancellations

Joanna Buscemi, Mary Takgbajouah, Alexander O’Donnell, Elise Betkowski, Tetyana Krutsik, Jasrah Ali
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The National Institutes of Health (NIH) supports critical biomedical and behavioral health research conducted in the United States through grant funding every year. Recently, several NIH grants that had been awarded and passed full scientific peer review were suspended or canceled with little scientific or performance rationale. As a result of the NIH grant suspensions, important research related to Cancer, COVID-19, and mental health, among others, have been affected, with a loss of at least $643 million in funding. The grant suspensions have halted clinical trials in progress, and could be setting back important biomedical trials and research related to chronic disease, including cardiovascular disease and diabetes, which could benefit the public. While the grant cuts have been claimed to be due to a lack of scientific validity, rigor, or public benefit, these assertions are contrary to the findings of the NIH, researchers, and experts in the field who were initially involved in evaluating and awarding the grants. In order to prevent further unwarranted grant cancellations, we ask congress to consider holding oversight hearings regarding the NIH grant suspensions. Additionally, we ask that they introduce or support legislation that would help to prevent further unjustified grant suspensions and secure predictable funding for biomedical and behavioral health research. Congress must prevent the termination of NIH research grants that have already been awarded through lawful, competitive processes. Legislators must use their constitutional spending authority to ensure agencies execute appropriated funds, to ensure funding efficiency, life-saving medical innovation, and US scientific competitiveness globally. Lay summary Grants awarded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) for health research, including research on vaccines and health disparities, have been suspended after going through the process of peer review and being awarded a grant. The reasons for the grant suspensions go against the findings of the NIH on the scientific validity, importance, and benefit to the public of the research being conducted, with a lack of justification being given to congress, the researchers, or the public. To address the NIH grant cancellations and try to prevent further suspensions, we ask congress to initiate hearings focused on the grant cancellations and introduce legislation to prevent unwarranted grant cancellations in the future.

Translational Behavioral MedicineVol. 15(1)
DePaul University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Science, Research, and Medicine
1.70
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.