Policy lessons on fruits and vegetables from the Philippine high-value crops and organic agriculture programs

Low fruit and vegetable consumption is a major dietary risk factor globally, yet many countries, including the Philippines, under-prioritize this sector compared to staple crops. This study analyses the policy context for fruits and vegetables in the Philippines, focusing on the implementation of two key programs of the Department of Agriculture-the High Value Crops Development Program (HVCDP) and the National Organic Agriculture Program (NOAP)-to identify enabling factors, challenges, and transferable lessons for strengthening fruit and vegetable policy. Guided by policy learning and multiple streams theory, 44 key informant interviews were conducted with stakeholders across government, civil society, academia, and the private sector. The findings reveal that the HVCDP and NOAP offer complementary and mutually reinforcing strengths in supporting the fruit and vegetable sector. Both programs demonstrate effectiveness through multi-level and vertically integrated governance. HVCDP contributes through its emphasis on infrastructure investment and crop-specific planning, while NOAP strengthens the system through an end-to-end value chain approach, including capacity building, peer-to-peer learning, and accessible certification mechanisms tailored to smallholder organic producers. Despite these strengths, both programs face challenges, including policy fragmentation, inconsistent funding, research-farmer disconnects, limited market development, and insufficient technical support. We recommend five areas for enhancement: strengthening policy coordination through integrated frameworks, improving funding allocation, enhancing research-farmer linkages, developing market systems, and strengthening extension services. These insights contribute to knowledge on effective fruit and vegetable policies within food systems frameworks, offering guidance for similar contexts seeking to improve nutrition outcomes through greater policy prioritization of fruits and vegetables.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Promotion International
Published
2025-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daaf180
Primary Topic
Organic Food and Agriculture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Policy lessons on fruits and vegetables from the Philippine high-value crops and organic agriculture programs

Anne Marie Thow, Ilana Cliffer, Jody Harris, S Perera et al.
Health Promotion International
Organic Food and Agriculture
article

Policy lessons on fruits and vegetables from the Philippine high-value crops and organic agriculture programs

Anne Marie Thow, Ilana Cliffer, Jody Harris, S Perera, Elaine Q. Borazon
article en

Abstract

Low fruit and vegetable consumption is a major dietary risk factor globally, yet many countries, including the Philippines, under-prioritize this sector compared to staple crops. This study analyses the policy context for fruits and vegetables in the Philippines, focusing on the implementation of two key programs of the Department of Agriculture-the High Value Crops Development Program (HVCDP) and the National Organic Agriculture Program (NOAP)-to identify enabling factors, challenges, and transferable lessons for strengthening fruit and vegetable policy. Guided by policy learning and multiple streams theory, 44 key informant interviews were conducted with stakeholders across government, civil society, academia, and the private sector. The findings reveal that the HVCDP and NOAP offer complementary and mutually reinforcing strengths in supporting the fruit and vegetable sector. Both programs demonstrate effectiveness through multi-level and vertically integrated governance. HVCDP contributes through its emphasis on infrastructure investment and crop-specific planning, while NOAP strengthens the system through an end-to-end value chain approach, including capacity building, peer-to-peer learning, and accessible certification mechanisms tailored to smallholder organic producers. Despite these strengths, both programs face challenges, including policy fragmentation, inconsistent funding, research-farmer disconnects, limited market development, and insufficient technical support. We recommend five areas for enhancement: strengthening policy coordination through integrated frameworks, improving funding allocation, enhancing research-farmer linkages, developing market systems, and strengthening extension services. These insights contribute to knowledge on effective fruit and vegetable policies within food systems frameworks, offering guidance for similar contexts seeking to improve nutrition outcomes through greater policy prioritization of fruits and vegetables.

Health Promotion InternationalVol. 40(6)
The University of Sydney (AU), World Vegetable Center (TW), National Sun Yat-sen University (TW), Kasetsart University (TH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Organic Food and Agriculture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.