MODERN HIGHER EDUCATION MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES: UZBEKISTAN – CHINA NATIONAL MODELS COMPARISON

This study compares higher education management strategies in Uzbekistan and China through the lens of New Public Management (NPM). Using qualitative analysis, it explores governance, quality assurance, and innovation in both systems. While China’s reforms focus on global competitiveness, Uzbekistan emphasizes digitalization and international standards. Despite differences in scale and maturity, both aim to balance state control with institutional autonomy. The findings highlight the importance of context-specific, adaptive strategies for successful higher education reform.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Affairs Politics Economics Law
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63407/639308
Primary Topic
China's Ethnic Minorities and Relations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

MODERN HIGHER EDUCATION MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES: UZBEKISTAN – CHINA NATIONAL MODELS COMPARISON

Zhao Rong, Matyokub Bakoev
International Affairs Politics Economics Law
China's Ethnic Minorities and Relations
article

MODERN HIGHER EDUCATION MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES: UZBEKISTAN – CHINA NATIONAL MODELS COMPARISON

Zhao Rong, Matyokub Bakoev
article en

Abstract

This study compares higher education management strategies in Uzbekistan and China through the lens of New Public Management (NPM). Using qualitative analysis, it explores governance, quality assurance, and innovation in both systems. While China’s reforms focus on global competitiveness, Uzbekistan emphasizes digitalization and international standards. Despite differences in scale and maturity, both aim to balance state control with institutional autonomy. The findings highlight the importance of context-specific, adaptive strategies for successful higher education reform.

International Affairs Politics Economics LawVol. 4(1)
University of International Business (KZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
China's Ethnic Minorities and Relations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.