Theory of Change in Multi-country Advocacy Programmes: Usage, Relevance and Implications for Local Ownership

Theory of change is often endorsed and used to support within-country programming. This country-level use, however, remains unexplored. This study investigates country-level use in a multi-country advocacy programme to understand its local operation and effects. In line with prescriptions, it focuses on adaptability to country-specific conditions. Examining experiences of staff of civil society organizations involved, this article finds that theory of change provides guidance and coordination for local actors, that it has limited relevance for strategizing and that it fails to recognize local assets on which outcomes depend. The article concludes that the manner in which theory of change is used can either handicap or facilitate local ownership of advocacy. It concludes by offering a way of approaching theory of change that is more sensitive to the local assets and ownership on which advocacy outcomes are dependent.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Progress in Development Studies
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/14649934251384705
Primary Topic
Policy Transfer and Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Theory of Change in Multi-country Advocacy Programmes: Usage, Relevance and Implications for Local Ownership

Wenny Ho, Peter A. Tamás, Margit van Wessel
Progress in Development Studies
Policy Transfer and Learning
article

Theory of Change in Multi-country Advocacy Programmes: Usage, Relevance and Implications for Local Ownership

Wenny Ho, Peter A. Tamás, Margit van Wessel
article en

Abstract

Theory of change is often endorsed and used to support within-country programming. This country-level use, however, remains unexplored. This study investigates country-level use in a multi-country advocacy programme to understand its local operation and effects. In line with prescriptions, it focuses on adaptability to country-specific conditions. Examining experiences of staff of civil society organizations involved, this article finds that theory of change provides guidance and coordination for local actors, that it has limited relevance for strategizing and that it fails to recognize local assets on which outcomes depend. The article concludes that the manner in which theory of change is used can either handicap or facilitate local ownership of advocacy. It concludes by offering a way of approaching theory of change that is more sensitive to the local assets and ownership on which advocacy outcomes are dependent.

Progress in Development StudiesVol. 25(2)
Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Policy Transfer and Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Theory of Change in Multi-country Advocacy Programmes: Usage, Relevance and Implications for Local Ownership — Wenny Ho, Peter A. Tamás, et al. · Progress in Development Studies (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS