Assessment of relationships between frailty and diabetes: A two-sample Mendelian randomization study

ObjectivesObservational studies have suggested a unidirectional association between frailty and diabetes; however, their causal relationship remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the bidirectional causal associations between frailty and diabetes to provide more definitive evidence.MethodsWe conducted a two-sample Mendelian randomization study using genome-wide association study data to examine the bidirectional causal relationship between frailty-measured by the frailty index and Fried Frailty Phenotype-and diabetes, including type 2 diabetes mellitus, type 1 diabetes mellitus, fasting glucose, fasting insulin, and glycated hemoglobin. The inverse variance-weighted method was used for the primary analysis. Pleiotropy was assessed using the Mendelian randomization-Egger intercept and Mendelian randomization-PRESSO methods. Sensitivity analyses were performed using the leave-one-out approach and Cochran's Q test to ensure robustness of the findings.ResultsType 2 diabetes mellitus was significantly associated with both the frailty index (β = 0.029, 95% confidence interval: 0.014-0.043, p<i> </i>=<i> </i>6.00 × 10<sup>-5</sup>) and the Fried Frailty Phenotype (β = 0.025, 95% confidence interval: 0.016-0.033, p<i> </i>=<i> </i>2.78 × 10<sup>-9</sup>). Type 1 diabetes mellitus demonstrated a weaker positive association with the Fried Frailty Phenotype (β = 0.004, 95% confidence interval: 0.0004-0.009, p<i> </i>=<i> </i>0.031). Among diabetes-related clinical traits, only glycated hemoglobin demonstrated significant associations with both the frailty index (β = 0.049, 95% confidence interval: 0.031-0.067, p<i> </i>=<i> </i>7.39 × 10<sup>-8</sup>) and the Fried Frailty Phenotype (β = 0.013, 95% confidence interval: 0.001-0.024, p<i> </i>=<i> </i>0.021). Reverse Mendelian randomization analyses indicated that frailty was significantly associated with an increased risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus and higher levels of glycated hemoglobin, but not with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Sensitivity analyses indicated no significant evidence of pleiotropy or heterogeneity (p<i> </i>><i> </i>0.05), supporting the reliability of the results.ConclusionsOur findings suggest a bidirectional causal relationship between frailty and both type 2 diabetes mellitus and glycated hemoglobin. However, the association between type 1 diabetes mellitus and frailty remains inconclusive and requires further research. These results provide important evidence to guide the prevention and clinical management of frailty and diabetes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of International Medical Research
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/03000605251381463
Primary Topic
Frailty in Older Adults
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of relationships between frailty and diabetes: A two-sample Mendelian randomization study

Yaoting Liu, Shuochao Yao, Shanshan Cui, Cong Fu et al.
Journal of International Medical Research
Frailty in Older Adults
article

Assessment of relationships between frailty and diabetes: A two-sample Mendelian randomization study

Yaoting Liu, Shuochao Yao, Shanshan Cui, Cong Fu, Yan Qin, Lan Zhang, Sha Liu
article en

Abstract

ObjectivesObservational studies have suggested a unidirectional association between frailty and diabetes; however, their causal relationship remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the bidirectional causal associations between frailty and diabetes to provide more definitive evidence.MethodsWe conducted a two-sample Mendelian randomization study using genome-wide association study data to examine the bidirectional causal relationship between frailty-measured by the frailty index and Fried Frailty Phenotype-and diabetes, including type 2 diabetes mellitus, type 1 diabetes mellitus, fasting glucose, fasting insulin, and glycated hemoglobin. The inverse variance-weighted method was used for the primary analysis. Pleiotropy was assessed using the Mendelian randomization-Egger intercept and Mendelian randomization-PRESSO methods. Sensitivity analyses were performed using the leave-one-out approach and Cochran's Q test to ensure robustness of the findings.ResultsType 2 diabetes mellitus was significantly associated with both the frailty index (β = 0.029, 95% confidence interval: 0.014-0.043, p<i> </i>=<i> </i>6.00 × 10<sup>-5</sup>) and the Fried Frailty Phenotype (β = 0.025, 95% confidence interval: 0.016-0.033, p<i> </i>=<i> </i>2.78 × 10<sup>-9</sup>). Type 1 diabetes mellitus demonstrated a weaker positive association with the Fried Frailty Phenotype (β = 0.004, 95% confidence interval: 0.0004-0.009, p<i> </i>=<i> </i>0.031). Among diabetes-related clinical traits, only glycated hemoglobin demonstrated significant associations with both the frailty index (β = 0.049, 95% confidence interval: 0.031-0.067, p<i> </i>=<i> </i>7.39 × 10<sup>-8</sup>) and the Fried Frailty Phenotype (β = 0.013, 95% confidence interval: 0.001-0.024, p<i> </i>=<i> </i>0.021). Reverse Mendelian randomization analyses indicated that frailty was significantly associated with an increased risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus and higher levels of glycated hemoglobin, but not with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Sensitivity analyses indicated no significant evidence of pleiotropy or heterogeneity (p<i> </i>><i> </i>0.05), supporting the reliability of the results.ConclusionsOur findings suggest a bidirectional causal relationship between frailty and both type 2 diabetes mellitus and glycated hemoglobin. However, the association between type 1 diabetes mellitus and frailty remains inconclusive and requires further research. These results provide important evidence to guide the prevention and clinical management of frailty and diabetes.

Journal of International Medical ResearchVol. 53(10)
Hebei General Hospital (CN), Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Frailty in Older Adults
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.