Sentinel Cerebral Embolic Protection in Patients with Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and Trial Sequential Analysis

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is widely used to treat severe aortic stenosis, and stroke remains a serious complication. The Sentinel cerebral embolic protection (CEP) device is designed to reduce this risk. However, it is still unclear if it truly improves patient outcomes. This meta-analysis evaluates whether the Sentinel device reduces stroke, death, or neurological complications. We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central for randomized controlled trials comparing the use of the Sentinel CEP versus no device in patients undergoing TAVR. Outcomes included stroke within 72 hours, disabling stroke, any stroke, transient ischemic attack, and mortality. Statistical analysis was performed using R version 4.4.2. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic. Five randomized controlled trials with 11,006 patients were included; 50.0% (n = 5502) received the CEP device and 50.0% (n = 5504) did not. Lower risk of stroke within 72 hours was observed with Sentinel CEP, although the difference was nonsignificant [2.3% vs 2.5%; risk ratio (RR): 0.88, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.69-1.12; P = 0.292; I2 = 0%]. No significant difference was observed in the incidence of transient ischemic attack between both groups (0.4% vs 0.3%; RR: 1.28, 95% CI: 0.66-2.50; P = 0.465; I2 = 0%). All-cause mortality rates were comparable between both groups (0.7% vs 0.7%; RR: 1.08, 95% CI: 0.69-1.69; P = 0.748; I2 = 0%). CEP during TAVR was not associated with a significant reduction in neurological or mortality outcomes, indicating no clear overall clinical benefit in the studied population. Further studies are needed to determine its potential role in selected high-risk patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cardiology in Review
Published
2025-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/crd.0000000000001084
Primary Topic
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sentinel Cerebral Embolic Protection in Patients with Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and Trial Sequential Analysis

Yash Garg, Anushka Purohit, Nigar Kirmani, Piyush Ratan et al.
Cardiology in Review
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
article

Sentinel Cerebral Embolic Protection in Patients with Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and Trial Sequential Analysis

Yash Garg, Anushka Purohit, Nigar Kirmani, Piyush Ratan, Darshil Kumar Maheta, Siddharth Agrawal, Devang Desai, Mir Wajid Majeed, Dhruvi Kalpesh Joshi, Juan Pinilia
article en

Abstract

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is widely used to treat severe aortic stenosis, and stroke remains a serious complication. The Sentinel cerebral embolic protection (CEP) device is designed to reduce this risk. However, it is still unclear if it truly improves patient outcomes. This meta-analysis evaluates whether the Sentinel device reduces stroke, death, or neurological complications. We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central for randomized controlled trials comparing the use of the Sentinel CEP versus no device in patients undergoing TAVR. Outcomes included stroke within 72 hours, disabling stroke, any stroke, transient ischemic attack, and mortality. Statistical analysis was performed using R version 4.4.2. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic. Five randomized controlled trials with 11,006 patients were included; 50.0% (n = 5502) received the CEP device and 50.0% (n = 5504) did not. Lower risk of stroke within 72 hours was observed with Sentinel CEP, although the difference was nonsignificant [2.3% vs 2.5%; risk ratio (RR): 0.88, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.69-1.12; P = 0.292; I2 = 0%]. No significant difference was observed in the incidence of transient ischemic attack between both groups (0.4% vs 0.3%; RR: 1.28, 95% CI: 0.66-2.50; P = 0.465; I2 = 0%). All-cause mortality rates were comparable between both groups (0.7% vs 0.7%; RR: 1.08, 95% CI: 0.69-1.69; P = 0.748; I2 = 0%). CEP during TAVR was not associated with a significant reduction in neurological or mortality outcomes, indicating no clear overall clinical benefit in the studied population. Further studies are needed to determine its potential role in selected high-risk patients.

Cardiology in Review
Safdarjang Hospital (IN), Patna Medical College and Hospital (IN), New York Medical College (US), University of Tennessee Medical Center (US), Dow University of Health Sciences (PK), Clínica CES (CO), B.J. Medical College (IN), University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.