‘Smart economics’ as gendered racial capitalism: a critique of corporate capitalism’s co-option of gender equity frameworks

This article highlights how ‘smart economics’ as a paradigm for gender equity reflects a continuum of the gendered and racialised history of capitalism’s appropriations of equity and social justice. By focusing on the example of one corporation, Unilever, and its co-option of social justice and equity discourse, the article aims to put into perspective the limits and ideological meanings of gender equity as ‘smart economics’ when understood as being on a continuum of gendered racial capitalism. Our aim is to highlight how a company with its roots in colonial commodity racism has not only segued into the contemporary global context by commodifying social justice issues but is actively utilising gender equity within its narrative of progress through ‘smart economics’. Rather than holding to account such corporate entities which have profited from colonialism and commodity racism, gender equity frameworks have enabled gendered racial capitalism as can be seen in Unilever’s corporate strategy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Third World Quarterly
Published
2025-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2025.2567495
Primary Topic
Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

‘Smart economics’ as gendered racial capitalism: a critique of corporate capitalism’s co-option of gender equity frameworks

Althea-Maria Rivas, Navtej K. Purewal
Third World Quarterly
Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
article

‘Smart economics’ as gendered racial capitalism: a critique of corporate capitalism’s co-option of gender equity frameworks

Althea-Maria Rivas, Navtej K. Purewal
article en

Abstract

This article highlights how ‘smart economics’ as a paradigm for gender equity reflects a continuum of the gendered and racialised history of capitalism’s appropriations of equity and social justice. By focusing on the example of one corporation, Unilever, and its co-option of social justice and equity discourse, the article aims to put into perspective the limits and ideological meanings of gender equity as ‘smart economics’ when understood as being on a continuum of gendered racial capitalism. Our aim is to highlight how a company with its roots in colonial commodity racism has not only segued into the contemporary global context by commodifying social justice issues but is actively utilising gender equity within its narrative of progress through ‘smart economics’. Rather than holding to account such corporate entities which have profited from colonialism and commodity racism, gender equity frameworks have enabled gendered racial capitalism as can be seen in Unilever’s corporate strategy.

Third World Quarterly
University of London (GB), SOAS University of London (GB), Universidad de Londres (MX), University of the Arts London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

‘Smart economics’ as gendered racial capitalism: a critique of corporate capitalism’s co-option of gender equity frameworks — Althea-Maria Rivas, Navtej K. Purewal · Third World Quarterly (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS