Relationships and Influencing Factors for Each Item of the Lumbar Motor Control Test

The lumbar motor control (LMC) test battery is widely used to assess LMC. Although studies have reported its reliability and discriminative validity, the inter-item relationships and item-specific determinants have been insufficiently characterized, with evidence remaining limited. Clarifying these aspects may enhance the interpretation of test results and support more precise clinical decision-making. Therefore, we aimed to examine the relationships among the items of the LMC test battery and identify the factors associated with each item. In total, 194 participants from a community health event were included in this study. Factors such as age, sex, low back pain, muscle mass, and autonomic balance were measured along with the LMC test battery. Muscle mass was measured using bioelectrical impedance analysis, and autonomic balance was assessed via heart rate variability. The relationships between LMC test battery items were analyzed using chi-square tests, and the factors influencing each item were identified using logistic regression analysis. Although most LMC test battery items showed positive correlations, the pelvic tilt test showed negative correlations with several other items. Age, sex, autonomic balance, and lower limb muscle mass were identified as significant contributors to specific tests; however, no factor was common to all items. Our results indicate that the total score, specific relationships between test items, and influencing factors of each item should be considered when interpreting the results of the LMC test battery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Perceptual and Motor Skills
Published
2025-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00315125251394961
Primary Topic
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Relationships and Influencing Factors for Each Item of the Lumbar Motor Control Test

Akio Goda, Masahiro Noguchi, Yuji Kanazawa, Hiromichi Takeda et al.
Perceptual and Motor Skills
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
article

Relationships and Influencing Factors for Each Item of the Lumbar Motor Control Test

Akio Goda, Masahiro Noguchi, Yuji Kanazawa, Hiromichi Takeda, Takaaki Nishimura, Ryo Miyachi, Wataru Tanaka, Tadashi Imai, Eisuke Takeshima
article en

Abstract

The lumbar motor control (LMC) test battery is widely used to assess LMC. Although studies have reported its reliability and discriminative validity, the inter-item relationships and item-specific determinants have been insufficiently characterized, with evidence remaining limited. Clarifying these aspects may enhance the interpretation of test results and support more precise clinical decision-making. Therefore, we aimed to examine the relationships among the items of the LMC test battery and identify the factors associated with each item. In total, 194 participants from a community health event were included in this study. Factors such as age, sex, low back pain, muscle mass, and autonomic balance were measured along with the LMC test battery. Muscle mass was measured using bioelectrical impedance analysis, and autonomic balance was assessed via heart rate variability. The relationships between LMC test battery items were analyzed using chi-square tests, and the factors influencing each item were identified using logistic regression analysis. Although most LMC test battery items showed positive correlations, the pelvic tilt test showed negative correlations with several other items. Age, sex, autonomic balance, and lower limb muscle mass were identified as significant contributors to specific tests; however, no factor was common to all items. Our results indicate that the total score, specific relationships between test items, and influencing factors of each item should be considered when interpreting the results of the LMC test battery.

Perceptual and Motor Skills
Kanazawa Hospital (JP), Hokuriku University (JP), Komatsu (Japan) (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.