Research Hotspots and Evolution Trends of CCUS Policy in Industrial Field From the Perspective of Carbon Peaking and Carbon Neutrality Goals

The transition toward carbon neutrality has placed carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) at the center of international climate strategies. Despite its strategic importance, the policy frameworks shaping CCUS remain fragmented and uneven. This study reviews the intellectual and policy evolution of CCUS governance to identify research hotspots, institutional dynamics, and future pathways. A bibliometric analysis was conducted using 968 publications from the Web of Science (WOS) Core Collection (2003–2024). CiteSpace was applied to map publication trends, cocitation networks, and keyword clusters. To move beyond descriptive mapping, the findings were interpreted through established policy analysis perspectives, including the advocacy coalition framework (ACF) and multilevel perspective (MLP) on sociotechnical transitions. The field has progressed through three phases: exploratory (2003–2008), expansion (2009–2019), and rapid growth (2020–present), reflecting the global diffusion of net‐zero commitments. Research has converged on five policy dimensions: normative frameworks, macroeconomic support, regulatory instruments, financial incentives, and technoeconomic analysis (TEA). Emerging themes include project‐level cost–benefit analysis, integration with hydrogen and bioenergy systems, and standardization of monitoring and verification protocols. However, gaps persist in Global South representation, cross‐sector collaboration, and attention to social and institutional factors. This review demonstrates that CCUS policy research is transitioning from descriptive assessments toward operational governance support. Future work should emphasize interdisciplinary frameworks, equitable geographic coverage, and engagement with emerging tools such as digital modeling, participatory governance, and integrated carbon management systems. These directions are essential for enabling CCUS to contribute effectively within broader net‐zero ecosystems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Chemical Engineering
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1155/ijce/3051142
Primary Topic
Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Research Hotspots and Evolution Trends of CCUS Policy in Industrial Field From the Perspective of Carbon Peaking and Carbon Neutrality Goals

Huihui Chen, Didi Wu, Sheng Bi, Yao Yao et al.
International Journal of Chemical Engineering
Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
article

Research Hotspots and Evolution Trends of CCUS Policy in Industrial Field From the Perspective of Carbon Peaking and Carbon Neutrality Goals

Huihui Chen, Didi Wu, Sheng Bi, Yao Yao, Zhidong Li, Fan Min, Hu Fang
article en

Abstract

The transition toward carbon neutrality has placed carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) at the center of international climate strategies. Despite its strategic importance, the policy frameworks shaping CCUS remain fragmented and uneven. This study reviews the intellectual and policy evolution of CCUS governance to identify research hotspots, institutional dynamics, and future pathways. A bibliometric analysis was conducted using 968 publications from the Web of Science (WOS) Core Collection (2003–2024). CiteSpace was applied to map publication trends, cocitation networks, and keyword clusters. To move beyond descriptive mapping, the findings were interpreted through established policy analysis perspectives, including the advocacy coalition framework (ACF) and multilevel perspective (MLP) on sociotechnical transitions. The field has progressed through three phases: exploratory (2003–2008), expansion (2009–2019), and rapid growth (2020–present), reflecting the global diffusion of net‐zero commitments. Research has converged on five policy dimensions: normative frameworks, macroeconomic support, regulatory instruments, financial incentives, and technoeconomic analysis (TEA). Emerging themes include project‐level cost–benefit analysis, integration with hydrogen and bioenergy systems, and standardization of monitoring and verification protocols. However, gaps persist in Global South representation, cross‐sector collaboration, and attention to social and institutional factors. This review demonstrates that CCUS policy research is transitioning from descriptive assessments toward operational governance support. Future work should emphasize interdisciplinary frameworks, equitable geographic coverage, and engagement with emerging tools such as digital modeling, participatory governance, and integrated carbon management systems. These directions are essential for enabling CCUS to contribute effectively within broader net‐zero ecosystems.

International Journal of Chemical EngineeringVol. 2025(1)
Sinopec (China) (CN), Hefei Normal University (CN), China University of Petroleum, East China (CN), China National Petroleum Corporation (China) (CN)
Hefei Normal University
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.