Mapping the Field of Shared Governance: Understanding the Landscape of Staff Representation Mechanisms in the American South

In this study, we introduce a new database documenting mechanisms of staff representation in shared governance within the southern region of the United States. We identified over 240 four-year, degree-granting institutions with evidence of a staff governing body and conducted a regression analysis to determine the relationship between staff representation and institutional characteristics. The results of our analysis revealed that certain institutional characteristics are correlated to the absence or presence of staff governing mechanisms including control, size, Carnegie classification, and AAUP membership. To our knowledge, this database is the first of its kind documenting staff governance on a regional scale and contributes to the important scholarship on professional staff working in higher education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Educational Policy
Published
2025-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/08959048251382144
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Higher Education Governance and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mapping the Field of Shared Governance: Understanding the Landscape of Staff Representation Mechanisms in the American South

Samantha Silberstein, Sayyora Ibadullaeva, Ali Watts
1 citations
Educational Policy
Higher Education Governance and Development
8.52
article

Mapping the Field of Shared Governance: Understanding the Landscape of Staff Representation Mechanisms in the American South

Samantha Silberstein, Sayyora Ibadullaeva, Ali Watts
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In this study, we introduce a new database documenting mechanisms of staff representation in shared governance within the southern region of the United States. We identified over 240 four-year, degree-granting institutions with evidence of a staff governing body and conducted a regression analysis to determine the relationship between staff representation and institutional characteristics. The results of our analysis revealed that certain institutional characteristics are correlated to the absence or presence of staff governing mechanisms including control, size, Carnegie classification, and AAUP membership. To our knowledge, this database is the first of its kind documenting staff governance on a regional scale and contributes to the important scholarship on professional staff working in higher education.

Educational Policy
University of North Carolina Wilmington (US), Bowling Green State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Higher Education Governance and Development
8.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.