Establishing Multicultural Validity: A Culturally Responsive Approach to Trustworthiness in Archival Research

From a culturally responsive research (CRR) perspective, trustworthiness is rooted in culture. The multicultural validity framework acknowledges that inquiry is shaped by cultural context and power and offers guidance for establishing trustworthiness. This article applies the framework to archival research, where researchers engage historical texts rather than living participants. We explore the challenges of maintaining cultural responsiveness without direct community interaction and reflect on how our team dynamics and engagement with materials shaped our findings. By emphasizing the role of archival and researcher-generated texts, we extend the multicultural validity framework and offer a nuanced approach to addressing validity in CRR.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Qualitative Inquiry
Published
2025-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10778004251387071
Primary Topic
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Establishing Multicultural Validity: A Culturally Responsive Approach to Trustworthiness in Archival Research

M.E. Anderson, Jori N. Hall
Qualitative Inquiry
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
article

Establishing Multicultural Validity: A Culturally Responsive Approach to Trustworthiness in Archival Research

M.E. Anderson, Jori N. Hall
article en

Abstract

From a culturally responsive research (CRR) perspective, trustworthiness is rooted in culture. The multicultural validity framework acknowledges that inquiry is shaped by cultural context and power and offers guidance for establishing trustworthiness. This article applies the framework to archival research, where researchers engage historical texts rather than living participants. We explore the challenges of maintaining cultural responsiveness without direct community interaction and reflect on how our team dynamics and engagement with materials shaped our findings. By emphasizing the role of archival and researcher-generated texts, we extend the multicultural validity framework and offer a nuanced approach to addressing validity in CRR.

Qualitative Inquiry
Centre College (US), University of Illinois Chicago (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.