Development of the Singapore workplace wellbeing scale

The present research described the development of the Singapore Workplace Wellbeing scale which identified the factors that influence employee wellbeing in the Singapore workplace context. Participants completed an online survey in two separate studies. Study 1 involved (N = 318) conducting a parallel analysis followed by exploratory factor analysis on items generated from a qualitative study in the first phase of the research in which 13 workplace wellbeing factors unique to the Singapore context were identified. A confirmation factor analysis was conducted on study 2 (N = 303) which confirmed a 13-factor scale with 99 items. These factors were support from boss, fairness, autonomy, meaningful work, co-worker relationship, role clarity, work-life balance, learning and professional growth, person-organisation fit, employee engagement, employee recognition, flexitime work, accomplishment, and organisation support. The new scale showed sound construct reliability, internal consistency, convergent validity, discriminant, and nomological validity. Importantly, the scale showed significant and positive association with job performance and flourishing, but a significant and negative association with burnout and the negative emotional state of depression, anxiety, and stress. The scale has significant potential to be used as workplace wellbeing screening tool and in research in the Singapore context. Implications, future directions, and limitations of the research are discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cogent Psychology
Published
2025-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2025.2571296
Primary Topic
Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development of the Singapore workplace wellbeing scale

Chad Chew Eun Yip, Yong Wah Goh, Tony Machin
Cogent Psychology
Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
article

Development of the Singapore workplace wellbeing scale

Chad Chew Eun Yip, Yong Wah Goh, Tony Machin
article en

Abstract

The present research described the development of the Singapore Workplace Wellbeing scale which identified the factors that influence employee wellbeing in the Singapore workplace context. Participants completed an online survey in two separate studies. Study 1 involved (N = 318) conducting a parallel analysis followed by exploratory factor analysis on items generated from a qualitative study in the first phase of the research in which 13 workplace wellbeing factors unique to the Singapore context were identified. A confirmation factor analysis was conducted on study 2 (N = 303) which confirmed a 13-factor scale with 99 items. These factors were support from boss, fairness, autonomy, meaningful work, co-worker relationship, role clarity, work-life balance, learning and professional growth, person-organisation fit, employee engagement, employee recognition, flexitime work, accomplishment, and organisation support. The new scale showed sound construct reliability, internal consistency, convergent validity, discriminant, and nomological validity. Importantly, the scale showed significant and positive association with job performance and flourishing, but a significant and negative association with burnout and the negative emotional state of depression, anxiety, and stress. The scale has significant potential to be used as workplace wellbeing screening tool and in research in the Singapore context. Implications, future directions, and limitations of the research are discussed.

Cogent PsychologyVol. 12(1)
University of Southern Queensland (AU), James Cook University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.