Expert views diverge on how to decarbonize transport

Transport accounts for about one-quarter of global energy-related carbon-dioxide (CO2) emissions. However, decarbonization policies only show incremental progress as most jurisdictions lack an integrated approach. Siloed thinking between the energy and transport sectors holds back the development of more effective policies for transport decarbonization, although previous work has only reported this anecdotally. We systematically identify diverging perspectives between energy and transport experts globally at all levels of government. Using thematic and frequency analysis of expert elicitation survey responses combined with machine learning, we find that (1) both sectors tend to have a narrow focus that neglects broader issues and has led to policy failures; (2) views differ on which energy sources are sustainable with somewhat less variation on how to prioritize decarbonization measures; (3) both sectors support increased communication and coordination for better outcomes and efficiency; and (4) most experts anticipate that transport decarbonization will be insufficient to achieve net zero by 2050, with views varying more based on affiliation type and region. These results provide a starting point for governments to bridge the divide between the sectors and to formulate adequate policies enabling transport decarbonization in line with global climate and sustainability goals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability Science Practice and Policy
Published
2025-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2025.2569499
Primary Topic
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Expert views diverge on how to decarbonize transport

Iain Staffell, Audrey de Nazelle, Malte Jansen, Hannah E. Murdock
Sustainability Science Practice and Policy
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
article

Expert views diverge on how to decarbonize transport

Iain Staffell, Audrey de Nazelle, Malte Jansen, Hannah E. Murdock
article en

Abstract

Transport accounts for about one-quarter of global energy-related carbon-dioxide (CO2) emissions. However, decarbonization policies only show incremental progress as most jurisdictions lack an integrated approach. Siloed thinking between the energy and transport sectors holds back the development of more effective policies for transport decarbonization, although previous work has only reported this anecdotally. We systematically identify diverging perspectives between energy and transport experts globally at all levels of government. Using thematic and frequency analysis of expert elicitation survey responses combined with machine learning, we find that (1) both sectors tend to have a narrow focus that neglects broader issues and has led to policy failures; (2) views differ on which energy sources are sustainable with somewhat less variation on how to prioritize decarbonization measures; (3) both sectors support increased communication and coordination for better outcomes and efficiency; and (4) most experts anticipate that transport decarbonization will be insufficient to achieve net zero by 2050, with views varying more based on affiliation type and region. These results provide a starting point for governments to bridge the divide between the sectors and to formulate adequate policies enabling transport decarbonization in line with global climate and sustainability goals.

Sustainability Science Practice and PolicyVol. 21(1)
University of Sussex (GB), Zero Emissions Resource Organisation (NO), University College London (GB), Imperial College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Expert views diverge on how to decarbonize transport — Iain Staffell, Audrey de Nazelle, et al. · Sustainability Science Practice and Policy (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS