Validation of heart rate measured by the consumer-level wearable device Fitbit: a cross-sectional observational study

[Purpose] The present study aimed to validate the heart rate of the consumer-level wearable device Fitbit Inspire 3. [Participants and Methods] Participants were 22 healthy university students (20.9 ± 0.6 years, 11 males and 11 females). They performed 5-minute resting lying, sitting, walking (3.2 km/h, 4.2 km/h, 6.0 km/h and 3.2 km/h with 3 kg backpack) and running (8.4 km/h running) on a treadmill, and stair climbing, with Fitbit- and electrocardiogram-based heart rate (Fitbit-HR and ECG-HR). The relationship between Fitbit-HR and ECG-HR was evaluated using a generalized linear mixed model. Additionally, Brandt-Altman analysis and absolute percentage error were used to examine the measurement error. [Results] Fitbit-HR was strongly associated with ECG-HR and oxygen uptake. In the Brandt-Altman analysis with Fitbit-HR and reference ECG-HR, most plots were within the limit of agreement. Fitbit-HR showed significant fixed errors, which were, on average, three beats smaller than those of ECG-HR. No significant proportional errors are observed. The mean absolute percentage error for most of the tasks was less than 10%. [Conclusion] The Fitbit Inspire 3 showed a strong correlation and clinically acceptable agreement with ECG-HR in healthy young adults, despite a small, consistent underestimation. Its validity was supported by its association with oxygen uptake.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Physical Therapy Science
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.37.561
Primary Topic
Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validation of heart rate measured by the consumer-level wearable device Fitbit: a cross-sectional observational study

Shigeya Tanaka, Daisuke Higuchi, Yosuke Tomita, Yuko Takahashi
Journal of Physical Therapy Science
Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
article

Validation of heart rate measured by the consumer-level wearable device Fitbit: a cross-sectional observational study

Shigeya Tanaka, Daisuke Higuchi, Yosuke Tomita, Yuko Takahashi
article en

Abstract

[Purpose] The present study aimed to validate the heart rate of the consumer-level wearable device Fitbit Inspire 3. [Participants and Methods] Participants were 22 healthy university students (20.9 ± 0.6 years, 11 males and 11 females). They performed 5-minute resting lying, sitting, walking (3.2 km/h, 4.2 km/h, 6.0 km/h and 3.2 km/h with 3 kg backpack) and running (8.4 km/h running) on a treadmill, and stair climbing, with Fitbit- and electrocardiogram-based heart rate (Fitbit-HR and ECG-HR). The relationship between Fitbit-HR and ECG-HR was evaluated using a generalized linear mixed model. Additionally, Brandt-Altman analysis and absolute percentage error were used to examine the measurement error. [Results] Fitbit-HR was strongly associated with ECG-HR and oxygen uptake. In the Brandt-Altman analysis with Fitbit-HR and reference ECG-HR, most plots were within the limit of agreement. Fitbit-HR showed significant fixed errors, which were, on average, three beats smaller than those of ECG-HR. No significant proportional errors are observed. The mean absolute percentage error for most of the tasks was less than 10%. [Conclusion] The Fitbit Inspire 3 showed a strong correlation and clinically acceptable agreement with ECG-HR in healthy young adults, despite a small, consistent underestimation. Its validity was supported by its association with oxygen uptake.

Journal of Physical Therapy ScienceVol. 37(11)
Takasaki University of Health and Welfare (JP)
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.