Higher Risk for Morbidity and Non-Aortic Related Mortality in Type 2 Endoleak Patients Treated Outside of Instructions for Use
ObjectiveTo evaluate outcomes in patients with type 2 endoleak (T2E) and the impact of treatment outside the device instructions for use (IFU).MethodsThis retrospective single-center study included abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) patients who underwent EVAR (2011- 2024). Primary outcomes were 30-day and mid-term complications, reintervention, and mortality by T2E status. Propensity score matching was applied and secondary analysis stratified outcomes by IFU compliance, comparing within (<sub>in</sub>IFU) or outside(<sub>out</sub>IFU) IFU in each T2E group.ResultsAmong 154 EVAR patients (137 men (89.1%) and 17 women (11.0%); mean age 77.5 ± 7.6 years), 77 were T2E(-), and 77 were T2E(+). Baseline characteristics were similar. Thirty-day complications were comparable (T2E(-): 5, 6.4% vs T2E(+): 2, 2.56%, <i>P</i> = 0.72). The mean follow-up duration was 2.7 ± 2.4 years. Sac diameter change (Δ) decreased in the T2E(-) (7.7 ± 8.4 mm) and enlarged in the T2E(+) (1.79 ± 12.5 mm; <i>P</i> < 0.01). Mid-term graft-related complications (T2E(-): 3, 3.8% vs T2E(+): 49, 62.8%, <i>P</i> < 0.01) and reinterventions (T2E(-): 3, 3.8%, vs T2E(+): 20, 25.6% <i>P</i> < 0.01) were higher in the T2E(+) with no difference in mortality (<i>P</i> = 1.00). These findings remained after excluding type 1 endoleaks. Among the T2E(+), those treated <sub>out</sub>IFU had longer hospital stays (<sub>out</sub>IFU: 3.0 ± 2.8 days vs <sub>in</sub>IFU: 1.8 ± 2.0 days, <i>P</i> = 0.03), higher T1E (<sub>out</sub>IFU: 3, 33.3% vs <sub>in</sub>IFU: 1, 4.34%, <i>P</i> < 0.01), higher rates of reintervention (<sub>out</sub>IFU: 9, 100.0% vs <sub>in</sub>IFU:17; 24.6%, <i>P</i> < 0.01) and higher all-cause mortality than those within IFU criteria (<sub>out</sub>IFU: 5, 55.0% vs <sub>in</sub>IFU: 13, 18.8%, <i>P</i> < 0.01). IFU status did not significantly affect outcomes in T2E(-) patients.ConclusionsT2E is associated with sac growth and increased reinterventions, but not higher mortality. On subgroup analysis, those T2E(+) treated <sub>out</sub>IFU had longer hospitalizations, higher T1E rates, more reinterventions, and higher all-cause; but not aneurysmal-related mortality.
Authors
- Beau B. Toskich (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4707-7921)
- Jonathan Vandenberg
- Young Erben (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1571-6955)
- Ricardo Paz‐Fumagalli (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9006-116X)
- Biraaj Mahajan
- Charles Ritchie (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1419-3355)
- Houssam Farres (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5740-1601)
- Camilo Polanía-Sandoval (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4973-1608)
- Yetzali Claudio-Medina (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8344-0495)
- Hennessy Morales-Arroyo
- Christopher S. Jacobs
- Camila Esquetini-Vernon (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0004-4795-3367)
Institutions
- Jacksonville College (US)
- WinnMed (US)
- Mayo Clinic in Florida (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
- Published
- 2025-10-31
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1177/15385744251395118
- Primary Topic
- Aortic aneurysm repair treatments
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00