Health indicator modeling leveraging time-independent and time-dependent subtasks with adaptive standardization and physics-based Bayesian optimization for aeronautical structures

Monitoring the structural integrity of aeronautical structures is critical for safety, reducing maintenance costs, and enabling predictive maintenance. However, raw structural health monitoring (SHM) data are often noisy, high-dimensional, and difficult to interpret. To enable condition-based maintenance, it is essential to extract health indicators (HIs)—quantitative representations of structural degradation that evolve consistently over time. Accurately extracting HIs for composite structures is particularly challenging due to complex material behavior and multiple damage sources. While deep learning models offer potential, their application is limited by the lack of run-to-failure data and ground-truth HI labels. To address these challenges, this study proposes a novel approach that divides HI modeling into two tasks: time-independent (spatial) and time-dependent (temporal). This separation allows more effective data utilization, especially in the time-independent case. A semi-supervised spatial model is first developed and fine-tuned using a Bayesian algorithm with a coupled physics-based loss function that integrates both prognostic criteria and simulated labels—explicitly through the former and implicitly through the latter—embedding degradation physics into training. The study also introduces a new adaptive standardization technique for fatigue-based SHM and systematically evaluates principal component analysis (PCA)-based methods for dimensionality reduction prior to spatial and temporal modeling, simplifying subsequent network architectures. In the final stage, following time-based resampling, a semi-supervised temporal model captures HI evolution, with ensemble learning enhancing robustness. Validation on single-stiffener composite panels under fatigue loading, monitored via acoustic emission sensors, confirms the framework's generalizability and performance—achieving up to 90% (±2%) accuracy in prognostic metrics. • Constructing intelligent HIs using acoustic emission for stiffened composite panels. • Extracting spatial and temporal information in two subtasks (TIM and TDM). • Pretraining of the TIM to maximize data exploitation and improve performance. • Using physics-based Bayesian optimization to accommodate prognostic criteria. • Demonstrating a generalized 90% performance in the quality of HI based on criteria.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence
Published
2025-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2025.112767
Primary Topic
Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Health indicator modeling leveraging time-independent and time-dependent subtasks with adaptive standardization and physics-based Bayesian optimization for aeronautical structures

Morteza Moradi, Juan Chiachío, Dimitrios Zarouchas
Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence
Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
article

Health indicator modeling leveraging time-independent and time-dependent subtasks with adaptive standardization and physics-based Bayesian optimization for aeronautical structures

Morteza Moradi, Juan Chiachío, Dimitrios Zarouchas
article en

Abstract

Monitoring the structural integrity of aeronautical structures is critical for safety, reducing maintenance costs, and enabling predictive maintenance. However, raw structural health monitoring (SHM) data are often noisy, high-dimensional, and difficult to interpret. To enable condition-based maintenance, it is essential to extract health indicators (HIs)—quantitative representations of structural degradation that evolve consistently over time. Accurately extracting HIs for composite structures is particularly challenging due to complex material behavior and multiple damage sources. While deep learning models offer potential, their application is limited by the lack of run-to-failure data and ground-truth HI labels. To address these challenges, this study proposes a novel approach that divides HI modeling into two tasks: time-independent (spatial) and time-dependent (temporal). This separation allows more effective data utilization, especially in the time-independent case. A semi-supervised spatial model is first developed and fine-tuned using a Bayesian algorithm with a coupled physics-based loss function that integrates both prognostic criteria and simulated labels—explicitly through the former and implicitly through the latter—embedding degradation physics into training. The study also introduces a new adaptive standardization technique for fatigue-based SHM and systematically evaluates principal component analysis (PCA)-based methods for dimensionality reduction prior to spatial and temporal modeling, simplifying subsequent network architectures. In the final stage, following time-based resampling, a semi-supervised temporal model captures HI evolution, with ensemble learning enhancing robustness. Validation on single-stiffener composite panels under fatigue loading, monitored via acoustic emission sensors, confirms the framework's generalizability and performance—achieving up to 90% (±2%) accuracy in prognostic metrics. • Constructing intelligent HIs using acoustic emission for stiffened composite panels. • Extracting spatial and temporal information in two subtasks (TIM and TDM). • Pretraining of the TIM to maximize data exploitation and improve performance. • Using physics-based Bayesian optimization to accommodate prognostic criteria. • Demonstrating a generalized 90% performance in the quality of HI based on criteria.

Engineering Applications of Artificial IntelligenceVol. 163
Instituto Andaluz de Ciencias de la Tierra (ES), Delft University of Technology (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.