Validation of a Tool for the Assessment of Discomfort in Patients With Impaired Cognition in Palliative Care

BackgroundIdeally, patients should self-report their symptoms. However, when this is not possible due to cognitive impairment, discomfort must be assessed through observation of the patient's behavior. To the best of our knowledge, there are no tools for such assessment in palliative care.MethodsA scale (Discomfort Scale for Palliative Care - DISPAC) was developed in 4 levels based on the frequency of signs of discomfort. The scale underwent face validity by 8 doctors and nurses experienced in palliative care. After that, DISPAC was compared with the DS-DAT and the VAS for construct validity using Spearman's ρ. The comparison was made by 4 observers: 2 for DISPAC (DISPAC1 and DISPAC2), 1 for DS-DAT, and 2 for VAS. The intraclass correlation coefficient was used to measure the degree of consistency between raters, and Cronbach's α was used to assess the internal consistency.ResultsThe results of the face validity were as follows: the scale measures what it is intended to measure; the scale is useful for clinical practice; the scale can improve communication among healthcare professionals; and the scale is easy to use. The internal consistency was 0.95. The inter-rater reliability was also 0.95 (<i>P</i> < 0.001). The correlation coefficients between DISPAC1 and DISPAC2 and the VAS were 0.712 (<i>P</i> < 0.001) and 0.723 (<i>P</i> < 0.001), respectively. The correlation with the DS-DAT was 0.689 (<i>P</i> < 0.001) and 0.615 (<i>P</i> < 0.001), respectively.ConclusionDISPAC is a valid and reliable scale for assessing discomfort in patients who are unable to report it.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine®
Published
2025-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10499091251393944
Primary Topic
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validation of a Tool for the Assessment of Discomfort in Patients With Impaired Cognition in Palliative Care

Graça Lopes, Sofia Marques da Silva, Rita Guedes, Ana Oliveira et al.
American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine®
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
article

Validation of a Tool for the Assessment of Discomfort in Patients With Impaired Cognition in Palliative Care

Graça Lopes, Sofia Marques da Silva, Rita Guedes, Ana Oliveira, Hugo M. Oliveira, Maria do Céu Rocha, Ana Marques, Filipa Pinto‐Ribeiro, Mariana Esteves, Tainah P. de P. Costa, Rose Mary Xavier, Ferraz Gonçalves, Ofélia Godinho
article en

Abstract

BackgroundIdeally, patients should self-report their symptoms. However, when this is not possible due to cognitive impairment, discomfort must be assessed through observation of the patient's behavior. To the best of our knowledge, there are no tools for such assessment in palliative care.MethodsA scale (Discomfort Scale for Palliative Care - DISPAC) was developed in 4 levels based on the frequency of signs of discomfort. The scale underwent face validity by 8 doctors and nurses experienced in palliative care. After that, DISPAC was compared with the DS-DAT and the VAS for construct validity using Spearman's ρ. The comparison was made by 4 observers: 2 for DISPAC (DISPAC1 and DISPAC2), 1 for DS-DAT, and 2 for VAS. The intraclass correlation coefficient was used to measure the degree of consistency between raters, and Cronbach's α was used to assess the internal consistency.ResultsThe results of the face validity were as follows: the scale measures what it is intended to measure; the scale is useful for clinical practice; the scale can improve communication among healthcare professionals; and the scale is easy to use. The internal consistency was 0.95. The inter-rater reliability was also 0.95 (<i>P</i> < 0.001). The correlation coefficients between DISPAC1 and DISPAC2 and the VAS were 0.712 (<i>P</i> < 0.001) and 0.723 (<i>P</i> < 0.001), respectively. The correlation with the DS-DAT was 0.689 (<i>P</i> < 0.001) and 0.615 (<i>P</i> < 0.001), respectively.ConclusionDISPAC is a valid and reliable scale for assessing discomfort in patients who are unable to report it.

American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine®
Universidade do Porto (PT), Hospital Pedro Hispano (PT), IPO Porto (PT), Escola Superior de Enfermagem da Universidade do Porto (PT), Association for the Development of Douro Viticulture (PT), Sydney Local Health District (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.