Comparison of three online modalities of an interprofessional education case study activity

Interprofessional education (IPE) is integral to training the new population of health practitioners who will provide care for the aging population in the United States. The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of an IPE activity focused on care of older adults for Nursing, Audiology, Communication Sciences, Gerontology, and Health Science students using three online modalities (synchronous, asynchronous, and bichronous). A quasi-experimental design was used to compare the three groups of online modalities. Health professions faculty and programs within a large public university in the Western United States. 177 students in combined classes (nursing, audiology, gerontology, health science, and speech language pathology) over three terms. Students participated in an IPE activity in one of three online modalities and completed pretest and posttest measures on knowledge of care of older adults and attitude toward IPE. Knowledge quiz scores significantly improved in all three groups (synchronous: t = -2.586, 2-sided p = 0.013; asynchronous: t = -4.129, 2-sided p < 0.001; bichronous: t = -3.748, 2-sided p < 0.001). Students also demonstrated increased attitudes toward working in teams in the IPAS subscale in the posttest in all three groups. ANOVA and Kruskal Wallis tests demonstrated no statistically significant differences in the knowledge quiz or IPAS subscale between the three modality groups. The qualitative analysis of the open-ended evaluation question supported the quantitative findings that all three modalities effectively improved attitudes toward IPE. The findings indicate that healthcare students can effectively learn to collaborate within an interprofessional team on a case study for older adults. Similar benefits across modalities suggest that diverse online formats can equally facilitate effective learning among healthcare students. Nursing and health professions faculty can provide effective interprofessional education activities in a variety of online modalities. • An online interprofessional education activity with Nursing, Audiology, Communication Sciences, Gerontology, and Health Science students can effectively increase knowledge about care of older adults and improve attitudes toward interprofessional collaboration. • The online interprofessional education activity can be effective when provided synchronously, asynchronously, or bichronously (a combination of synchronous and asynchronous instruction) with no significant differences between modalities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Interprofessional Education & Practice
Published
2025-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xjep.2025.100781
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.82
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of three online modalities of an interprofessional education case study activity

Tara J. Sharpp, Laura Gaeta
1 citations
Journal of Interprofessional Education & Practice
Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
2.82
article

Comparison of three online modalities of an interprofessional education case study activity

Tara J. Sharpp, Laura Gaeta
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Interprofessional education (IPE) is integral to training the new population of health practitioners who will provide care for the aging population in the United States. The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of an IPE activity focused on care of older adults for Nursing, Audiology, Communication Sciences, Gerontology, and Health Science students using three online modalities (synchronous, asynchronous, and bichronous). A quasi-experimental design was used to compare the three groups of online modalities. Health professions faculty and programs within a large public university in the Western United States. 177 students in combined classes (nursing, audiology, gerontology, health science, and speech language pathology) over three terms. Students participated in an IPE activity in one of three online modalities and completed pretest and posttest measures on knowledge of care of older adults and attitude toward IPE. Knowledge quiz scores significantly improved in all three groups (synchronous: t = -2.586, 2-sided p = 0.013; asynchronous: t = -4.129, 2-sided p < 0.001; bichronous: t = -3.748, 2-sided p < 0.001). Students also demonstrated increased attitudes toward working in teams in the IPAS subscale in the posttest in all three groups. ANOVA and Kruskal Wallis tests demonstrated no statistically significant differences in the knowledge quiz or IPAS subscale between the three modality groups. The qualitative analysis of the open-ended evaluation question supported the quantitative findings that all three modalities effectively improved attitudes toward IPE. The findings indicate that healthcare students can effectively learn to collaborate within an interprofessional team on a case study for older adults. Similar benefits across modalities suggest that diverse online formats can equally facilitate effective learning among healthcare students. Nursing and health professions faculty can provide effective interprofessional education activities in a variety of online modalities. • An online interprofessional education activity with Nursing, Audiology, Communication Sciences, Gerontology, and Health Science students can effectively increase knowledge about care of older adults and improve attitudes toward interprofessional collaboration. • The online interprofessional education activity can be effective when provided synchronously, asynchronously, or bichronously (a combination of synchronous and asynchronous instruction) with no significant differences between modalities.

Journal of Interprofessional Education & PracticeVol. 41
California State University, Sacramento (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
2.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.