Aphantasia, hyperphantasia and sensory imagery in a multi-cultural sample

Abstract Sensory imagery, such as visual imagery, is assumed to be a universal cognitive ability. However, research on cross-cultural studies of visual imagery experiences is lacking. Moreover, most research has focused on visual imagery, as opposed to other sensory imagery. Visual imagery presents with a large degree of individual variability and includes two extreme forms, aphantasia and hyperphantasia. This study investigated sensory imagery in a multi-cultural sample. Participants (N = 636) completed the Vividness of Visual Imagery Questionnaire (VVIQ) scale and the Plymouth Sensory Imagery Questionnaire (Psi-Q). Altogether, 5.0% of participants fell within the aphantasia range and 12.1% within the hyperphantasia range. No significant VVIQ differences were observed for gender, age, occupation, or education. VVIQ scores positively correlated with all Psi-Q imagery scales, suggesting interdependence across sensory modalities. To explore cultural differences, participants were divided into five cultural groups: (1) Western Educated Industrialized Rich & Democratic (WEIRD) (n = 89); (2) Southeast Asia (SEA, n = 121); (3) South Asia (n = 180); (4) Middle East and North Africa (MENA, n = 86), and (5) Arabian Gulf (AG, n = 43). WEIRD and SEA participants reported significantly higher levels of visual and sensory imagery than MENA and AG participants. This study contributes novel prevalence data for aphantasia and hyperphantasia in an ethnically and culturally diverse sample, emphasizing the importance of including non-WEIRD populations in research on sensory imagery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cultural Cognitive Science
Published
2025-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s41809-025-00184-8
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Face Recognition and Perception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.43
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Aphantasia, hyperphantasia and sensory imagery in a multi-cultural sample

Jennifer Bruder, Masooma Zehra
1 citations
Journal of Cultural Cognitive Science
Face Recognition and Perception
1.43
article

Aphantasia, hyperphantasia and sensory imagery in a multi-cultural sample

Jennifer Bruder, Masooma Zehra
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Sensory imagery, such as visual imagery, is assumed to be a universal cognitive ability. However, research on cross-cultural studies of visual imagery experiences is lacking. Moreover, most research has focused on visual imagery, as opposed to other sensory imagery. Visual imagery presents with a large degree of individual variability and includes two extreme forms, aphantasia and hyperphantasia. This study investigated sensory imagery in a multi-cultural sample. Participants (N = 636) completed the Vividness of Visual Imagery Questionnaire (VVIQ) scale and the Plymouth Sensory Imagery Questionnaire (Psi-Q). Altogether, 5.0% of participants fell within the aphantasia range and 12.1% within the hyperphantasia range. No significant VVIQ differences were observed for gender, age, occupation, or education. VVIQ scores positively correlated with all Psi-Q imagery scales, suggesting interdependence across sensory modalities. To explore cultural differences, participants were divided into five cultural groups: (1) Western Educated Industrialized Rich & Democratic (WEIRD) (n = 89); (2) Southeast Asia (SEA, n = 121); (3) South Asia (n = 180); (4) Middle East and North Africa (MENA, n = 86), and (5) Arabian Gulf (AG, n = 43). WEIRD and SEA participants reported significantly higher levels of visual and sensory imagery than MENA and AG participants. This study contributes novel prevalence data for aphantasia and hyperphantasia in an ethnically and culturally diverse sample, emphasizing the importance of including non-WEIRD populations in research on sensory imagery.

Journal of Cultural Cognitive ScienceVol. 9(3)
Carnegie Mellon University Qatar (QA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Face Recognition and Perception
1.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.