Research Registries and the Credibility Crisis: An Empirical and Theoretical Investigation
Abstract We analyze one prominent policy solution to the credibility crisis in experimental research—research registries—with primary focus on the AEA RCT Registry. We find that the AEA RCT Registry has had a limited impact to date. A majority of recent economics experiments are not registered, only about half of those registered did so prior to intervention, and most of these preregistrations lack sufficient detail. We find broad similarities when comparing these patterns to ClinicalTrials.gov. We then advance an economic model of registration to explore potential improvements to registries generally. The model shows banning late registration can significantly increase registry effectiveness.
Authors
- Eliot Abrams
- Jonathan Libgober (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0419-5696)
- John A. List (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1740-3848)
Institutions
- University of Southern California (US)
- Australian National University (AU)
- California Southern University (US)
- University of Chicago (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- The Economic Journal
- Published
- 2025-10-31
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1093/ej/ueaf120
- Primary Topic
- Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00