Binary effect of silica fume and waste glass powder as a cement replacement for a sustainable concrete

One promising implementation entails the utilization of silica fume and waste glass powder. This study aims to examine the impact of incorporating twelve different combinations of Glass Powder (GP) and Silica Fume (SF) as partial cement replacements in concrete mixtures. The experimental proportions include individual replacements of GP (5%, 10%, 15%, 20%) and SF (5%, 10%, 15%, 20%), along with blended combinations (GP 20%-SF 20%, GP 10%-SF 10%, GP 20%-SF 10%, GP 10%-SF 20%, GP 15%-SF 15%, GP 15%-SF 5%, and GP 5%-SF 15%). A thorough experimental investigation was conducted to examine key concrete properties, encompassing fresh state (workability), hardened state performance (compressive and tensile strength), durability indicators (water absorption and density), microstructural features (SEM), and elevated temperature resistance. Among the tested mixes, mix 10 (20% GP & 20% SF) demonstrated the highest slump compared to the control mix. Meanwhile, mix 5 (15% SF) achieved the greatest compressive strength, showing a 9.5% improvement over the control mix. This enhancement is due to the pozzolanic reaction of silica fume and glass powder, which refined the microstructure, thereby increasing strength. In terms of splitting tensile strength, mix 5 (15% SF) again performed the best, with a 13.3% increase over the control mix. On the other hand, mix 4 (15% GP) had the highest density, exhibiting a 2.6% rise compared to the control. Additionally, mix 3 (10% SF) displayed the lowest water absorption, attributed to the filler effect and pozzolanic activity, which sealed voids and densified the matrix, reducing water penetration into the samples. At 400 °C, mix M10 exhibited the highest residual compressive strength of 46.32 MPa, relative to the 28-day strength of the unexposed control, whereas mix M5 showed the lowest value of 38.34 MPa. This study demonstrates that incorporating GP and SF enhances concrete performance, reduces environmental impact, and offers a sustainable and practical solution for modern construction applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discover Concrete and Cement
Published
2025-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44416-025-00028-2
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Concrete and Cement Materials Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.91
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Binary effect of silica fume and waste glass powder as a cement replacement for a sustainable concrete

Anthony B. Murphy, Mohammad Ali Mosaberpanah, Ömer Damdelen, Stephen Babajide Olabimtan et al.
2 citations
Discover Concrete and Cement
Concrete and Cement Materials Research
1.91
article

Binary effect of silica fume and waste glass powder as a cement replacement for a sustainable concrete

Anthony B. Murphy, Mohammad Ali Mosaberpanah, Ömer Damdelen, Stephen Babajide Olabimtan, Babatunde Olufunso Oluwole
article en
2 citations

Abstract

One promising implementation entails the utilization of silica fume and waste glass powder. This study aims to examine the impact of incorporating twelve different combinations of Glass Powder (GP) and Silica Fume (SF) as partial cement replacements in concrete mixtures. The experimental proportions include individual replacements of GP (5%, 10%, 15%, 20%) and SF (5%, 10%, 15%, 20%), along with blended combinations (GP 20%-SF 20%, GP 10%-SF 10%, GP 20%-SF 10%, GP 10%-SF 20%, GP 15%-SF 15%, GP 15%-SF 5%, and GP 5%-SF 15%). A thorough experimental investigation was conducted to examine key concrete properties, encompassing fresh state (workability), hardened state performance (compressive and tensile strength), durability indicators (water absorption and density), microstructural features (SEM), and elevated temperature resistance. Among the tested mixes, mix 10 (20% GP & 20% SF) demonstrated the highest slump compared to the control mix. Meanwhile, mix 5 (15% SF) achieved the greatest compressive strength, showing a 9.5% improvement over the control mix. This enhancement is due to the pozzolanic reaction of silica fume and glass powder, which refined the microstructure, thereby increasing strength. In terms of splitting tensile strength, mix 5 (15% SF) again performed the best, with a 13.3% increase over the control mix. On the other hand, mix 4 (15% GP) had the highest density, exhibiting a 2.6% rise compared to the control. Additionally, mix 3 (10% SF) displayed the lowest water absorption, attributed to the filler effect and pozzolanic activity, which sealed voids and densified the matrix, reducing water penetration into the samples. At 400 °C, mix M10 exhibited the highest residual compressive strength of 46.32 MPa, relative to the 28-day strength of the unexposed control, whereas mix M5 showed the lowest value of 38.34 MPa. This study demonstrates that incorporating GP and SF enhances concrete performance, reduces environmental impact, and offers a sustainable and practical solution for modern construction applications.

Discover Concrete and CementVol. 1(1)
Cyprus International University (CY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Concrete and Cement Materials Research
1.91
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.