All India Difficult Airway Association 2025 guidelines for the management of unanticipated difficult airway in adults, obstetrics, and paediatrics and the management of at-risk extubations: Guideline development process and methodology

The All India Difficult Airway Association (AIDAA) methodology document describes the guideline development process and methodology employed for the AIDAA 2025 Guidelines for the management of unanticipated difficult airway in adults, obstetrics, and paediatrics and the management of <i>at-risk</i> extubations. The process for constituting the Steering Committee and Guideline Subcommittees and managing conflicts is described. Patients or Population-Intervention-Comparison-Outcome (PICO) questions were formulated for the respective guidelines. A systematic literature search was performed by a librarian from January 2000 to December 2024. A PRISMA flowchart describing the search process was prepared for each research question. The evidence was summarised and recommendations categorised according to the American Heart Association (AHA) Class of Recommendations and Level of Evidence for clinical strategies, interventions, treatments, or diagnostic testing in patient care. In addition, a Delphi process was conducted by the Steering Committee and a Delphi methodologist to achieve consensus among 24 airway experts for the clinical research questions using Delphi methodology, where the evidence was either lacking or weak. The Steering Committee coordinated the iterative Delphi rounds and refrained from participating in the voting process to prevent potential bias. The Delphi survey results were reported based on the Accurate Consensus Reporting Document (ACCORD) Guidelines<i>.</i> Consensus was established when 75% or more of panellists selected the same option(s) in multiple-choice statements and the seven-point Likert scale statements. Expert consensus statements were drafted from the survey statements that achieved consensus. A plan for guideline dissemination, promotion, integration into clinical practice and revision has also been included.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Indian Journal of Anaesthesia
Published
2025-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/ija.ija_587_25
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Tracheal and airway disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.11
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

All India Difficult Airway Association 2025 guidelines for the management of unanticipated difficult airway in adults, obstetrics, and paediatrics and the management of at-risk extubations: Guideline development process and methodology

Sheila Nainan Myatra, Syed Mansoor Ahmed, Rakesh Garg, Pankaj Kundra et al.
6 citations
Indian Journal of Anaesthesia
Tracheal and airway disorders
9.11
article

All India Difficult Airway Association 2025 guidelines for the management of unanticipated difficult airway in adults, obstetrics, and paediatrics and the management of at-risk extubations: Guideline development process and methodology

Sheila Nainan Myatra, Syed Mansoor Ahmed, Rakesh Garg, Pankaj Kundra, JesonR Doctor, Jigeeshu V. Divatia, Amit P. Shah, Sumalatha R. Shetty, Venkateswaran Ramkumar
article en
6 citations

Abstract

The All India Difficult Airway Association (AIDAA) methodology document describes the guideline development process and methodology employed for the AIDAA 2025 Guidelines for the management of unanticipated difficult airway in adults, obstetrics, and paediatrics and the management of <i>at-risk</i> extubations. The process for constituting the Steering Committee and Guideline Subcommittees and managing conflicts is described. Patients or Population-Intervention-Comparison-Outcome (PICO) questions were formulated for the respective guidelines. A systematic literature search was performed by a librarian from January 2000 to December 2024. A PRISMA flowchart describing the search process was prepared for each research question. The evidence was summarised and recommendations categorised according to the American Heart Association (AHA) Class of Recommendations and Level of Evidence for clinical strategies, interventions, treatments, or diagnostic testing in patient care. In addition, a Delphi process was conducted by the Steering Committee and a Delphi methodologist to achieve consensus among 24 airway experts for the clinical research questions using Delphi methodology, where the evidence was either lacking or weak. The Steering Committee coordinated the iterative Delphi rounds and refrained from participating in the voting process to prevent potential bias. The Delphi survey results were reported based on the Accurate Consensus Reporting Document (ACCORD) Guidelines<i>.</i> Consensus was established when 75% or more of panellists selected the same option(s) in multiple-choice statements and the seven-point Likert scale statements. Expert consensus statements were drafted from the survey statements that achieved consensus. A plan for guideline dissemination, promotion, integration into clinical practice and revision has also been included.

Indian Journal of AnaesthesiaVol. 69(11)
Homi Bhabha National Institute (IN), Babasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar Bihar University (IN), Lilavati Hospital & Research Centre (IN), Midas Multispeciality Hospital (IN), DR. B.R.A. Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital (IN), K S Hegde Medical Academy (IN), Jawaharlal Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research (IN), Kasturba Medical College, Manipal (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Tracheal and airway disorders
9.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.