Social-ecological conflicts: An emancipatory conceptual approach by bringing other-than-humans into environmental conflict analysis

This paper contributes to the study of other-than-humans in environmental conflicts. In light of the increasing number of environmental conflicts arising from multiple intensifying societal and ecological crises, scholars are calling for nature, or more specifically other-than-humans, to be seen as relevant forces in conflicts. To broaden the anthropocentric understanding of environmental conflicts as social conflicts about nature, we elaborate a conceptual approach to social-ecological conflicts with nature by bringing other-than-humans into the analysis. We propose social-ecological conflict analysis as a conceptual approach for recognising the interlinked emancipatory potential that unfolds in conflicts for both marginalised people and other-than-humans. We conceptualise social-ecological conflicts as spatiotemporal encounters between two or more coalitions, each consisting of both societal and other-than-human conflict parties. These encounters emerge from incompatible societal relations to nature expressed by the different coalitions, such as the capitalist appropriation of nature versus the sustainable coexistence of society and nature. While rejecting an a priori ontological separation of society and nature, we analytically differentiate between humans, living and non-living other-than-humans to reveal the reinforcing or competing relations that emerge between them in conflicts. We have elaborated analytical terms, such as social-ecological coalitions , conflict parties , effects and impulses that are applicable to humans and to other-than-humans. The development of the conceptual approach is based on an extensive literature review of studies on the role of other-than-humans in environmental conflicts. After a stepwise construction of key definitions and terms, we substantiate our concept empirically with the case of groundwater conflicts in the Júcar River Basin, Spain. To further strengthen social-ecological conflict analysis, we propose the application of the conceptual approach to empirical cases for further conceptual and methodological developments, as well as a discussion of the potentials for conflict interventions with social-ecological conflicts analysis in which conflicts are productive forces for emancipatory aspirations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environment and Planning E Nature and Space
Published
2025-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/25148486251384764
Primary Topic
Transboundary Water Resource Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Social-ecological conflicts: An emancipatory conceptual approach by bringing other-than-humans into environmental conflict analysis

Thomas Friedrich, Stefanie Burkhart, Diana Hummel, Thomas Fickel et al.
Environment and Planning E Nature and Space
Transboundary Water Resource Management
article

Social-ecological conflicts: An emancipatory conceptual approach by bringing other-than-humans into environmental conflict analysis

Thomas Friedrich, Stefanie Burkhart, Diana Hummel, Thomas Fickel, Katja Brinkmann, Fanny Frick-Trzebitzky, Luca Nitschke, Markus Rauchecker, David R. Kuhn
article en

Abstract

This paper contributes to the study of other-than-humans in environmental conflicts. In light of the increasing number of environmental conflicts arising from multiple intensifying societal and ecological crises, scholars are calling for nature, or more specifically other-than-humans, to be seen as relevant forces in conflicts. To broaden the anthropocentric understanding of environmental conflicts as social conflicts about nature, we elaborate a conceptual approach to social-ecological conflicts with nature by bringing other-than-humans into the analysis. We propose social-ecological conflict analysis as a conceptual approach for recognising the interlinked emancipatory potential that unfolds in conflicts for both marginalised people and other-than-humans. We conceptualise social-ecological conflicts as spatiotemporal encounters between two or more coalitions, each consisting of both societal and other-than-human conflict parties. These encounters emerge from incompatible societal relations to nature expressed by the different coalitions, such as the capitalist appropriation of nature versus the sustainable coexistence of society and nature. While rejecting an a priori ontological separation of society and nature, we analytically differentiate between humans, living and non-living other-than-humans to reveal the reinforcing or competing relations that emerge between them in conflicts. We have elaborated analytical terms, such as social-ecological coalitions , conflict parties , effects and impulses that are applicable to humans and to other-than-humans. The development of the conceptual approach is based on an extensive literature review of studies on the role of other-than-humans in environmental conflicts. After a stepwise construction of key definitions and terms, we substantiate our concept empirically with the case of groundwater conflicts in the Júcar River Basin, Spain. To further strengthen social-ecological conflict analysis, we propose the application of the conceptual approach to empirical cases for further conceptual and methodological developments, as well as a discussion of the potentials for conflict interventions with social-ecological conflicts analysis in which conflicts are productive forces for emancipatory aspirations.

Environment and Planning E Nature and SpaceVol. 9(1)
Goethe University Frankfurt (DE), Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (DE), Institute for Social-Ecological Research (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Transboundary Water Resource Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.